Featured Steven J. Lawson, The Gospel Focus of Charles Spurgeon , Part I

A+ on stories in that post - but not so well on actual facts.

In real life this is where we are in the john 12 discusison -

Your complaints against John 12:32 were completely resolved here #102
Then your next argument that Paul teaches salvation by works in Romans 2 was exposed here #105

After which you basically vacated the field .

How is it that when your solution runs aground on the facts of scripture -- this is "my fault"??

Rather it is up to you to improve your position so you are not so squarely opposing scripture.

obviously.

in Christ,

Bob

 

He did not see the scriptures as stating that either the elct are already saved regardless how they responded to jesus, nor that we are to preach unto just them, as he saw that God commanded us to preach and teach jesus to all sinners, and then let God handles the saving part!

 

Interesting to me the most here is that he, like myself, held to the 5 points, and yet also saw God at work to save infants and others unable to come to jesus through mentally assertions!

 

Have you come to grips though yet with the truth that the Gospel of the SDA is NOT the one Paul preached, nor Jesus Himself?

Until you do that, your reasoning on the Bible will indeed by :as thru a glass dimly"

 

I am informed that there will be substantive response to the answers given from Romans 2 and John 12:32 in the case above. That should be interesting.

I started this with #12 - but I think john 12 and Romans 2 might be a bit easier - so let's see.

in Christ,

Bob