Stimulus funds go to illicit and perverted shows

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by rbell, Aug 3, 2009.

  1. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your government $$ at work. And folks wonder why we don't trust Washington?

    The National Endowment for the Arts may be spending some of the money it received from the Recovery and Reinvestment Act to fund nude (further description removed by rbell) dances, Saturday night "pervert" revues and the airing of pornographic horror films at art houses in San Francisco.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535608,00.html

    Warning: It's sickening, but you need to know how your taxes are being spent.

    And since it's in San Fran, don't bother questioning it. It's Pelosi's district, and it's money for fun with Barney's "boys." So it's a protected minority (two of them, actually...gays, and professional looters).

    Great. As long as it preserves jobs, we should publicly fund p_rn horror flicks from the Land of Sodom.

    I think the best we can hope for is that people like this spokeswoman use birth control. Folks that stupid shouldn't procreate.
     
  2. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    so obama is giving our money to support and promote porn.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786
    There just is no decency with this man. Obama send tax payer money to slaughter unborn children and now this.
     
  4. Johnv

    Johnv
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    The problem lies less with Obama and more with the NEA, since it was the NEA who decided to spend a portion of the money on these programs. That said, one would have thought that it would have dawned on the authors of the stimulus package, including Obama, to at least include language that would exclude pornographic businesses from being disqualified from receiving stimulus funds.

    Regardless, I opposed both Obama's and Bush's bailout plans, and still do.
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786
    Baloney Obama and all of the liberal congress knows exactly what the NEA is willing to fund. this caught them not by surprise.
     
  6. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is true. Unfortunately, the NEA has been the recipient of our tax dollars for lewd art, etc., for decades, even sacriligious "art" about Jesus....under both Republican and Democratic controlled Congresses. You would think not, but sadly, our tax dollars have funded this perverse outfit for a long, long time. I cannot even provide links to some of the stuff this outfit has propogated, because it is SO bad and in fact, nauseating, besides being downright evil.
     
  7. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    if the NEA can't survive on it's own in the marketplace (and God help us all if it can)...then let it die.

    I'm sick of them giving my money to these perverted wastes of carbon and trace elements.
     
  8. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
  9. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Intellectual honesty isn't your strong suit, is it?

    Many of us here have bemoaned the funding for these slimeballs for decades, including the Bush years.

    You love Obama so much, that even when issues are brought up that are plain as day (after all...is there really any other position a Christian can take than to be offended by this)...you must defend your buddy.

    I can't tell if it's a pride thing with you (oh no...I can't agree with those bad guys!), or if you seriously are so Obamamanic that you must simply refuse to criticize him.

    Conclusion: This isn't about Bush, or Republicans. Start a new thread to bash them. We don't have a time machine, and we can't go back and un-fund NEA from 2002. We could do something now...but I guess you wouldn't be on board with it, because it might mean your having to criticize his holiness, pope Barack.
     
  10. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
  11. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no call to hurt LeBuick's feeling by demoting "the one" from savior to pope.
     

Share This Page

Loading...