Strict constitutionalists believe that if a topic is not mentioned in the Constitution, say a topic like abortion or prayer, should never have been heard in any federal court. That being said once a decision has been made by the Supreme Court, like Roe v. Wade. Is it a violation of that philosophy to hear the case again with the possibility of the decision being reversed? Most fundamentalists and conservative say they are strick Constitutionalists. So, are their violating their own philosophy in wanting the Court to hear and overturn Roe v. Wade again?