Supreme Court's tie vote upholds public employee fees for union

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Crabtownboy, Mar 29, 2016.

  1. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,619
    Likes Received:
    158
    The Supreme Court announced a tie vote today in what labor law experts had called a "life-or-death" case for public employee unions.

    The split decision preserves a long-standing rule that requires about half of the nation's teachers, transit workers and other public employees to pay a "fair share fee" to support their union.

    The tie vote will come as a relief to union officials who feared the conservative court was on the brink of striking down the pro-union laws that authorized these fees.
     
  2. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    208
    "Conservative court"?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,303
    Likes Received:
    784
    Forcing people to pay union dues simply because they got a job is unAmerican
     
  4. Alcott

    Alcott
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    93
    A communist court to become more communist before long.
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,303
    Likes Received:
    784
    The good news is that since it was a tie vote it is not binding on future rulings.
     
  6. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    208
    Seriously, CTB; "conservative court"? You have 3 justices that typically swing conservative; 4 that typically swing liberal; and Kennedy, who is a conservative but has been known to vote liberal. So how is it a "conservative court"? Even if Kennedy voted strictly conservative, the current court would be the epitome of partisan (evenly divided).

    So seriously: "conservative court"?
     
  7. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,619
    Likes Received:
    158
    Don, I did not write the piece, just copied and pasted it. So you do not consider the Court conservative. Other do. No surprises as there will always be differences of opinion.
     
  8. Rob_BW

    Rob_BW
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    266
    So federal employees aren't forced to pay union dues, but half of the Supreme Court justices think keeping it mandatory for state or municipal employees is okay?
     
  9. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    208
    Oh, I know. The question really is, how much credence to give to an article that claims "conservative court" when, as I pointed out, at best it's partisan down the middle. Kinda indicates a bias before you really even get into the article, doesn't it?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,619
    Likes Received:
    158
    I guess it all depends on what a person believes a conservative or a liberal is and what they do and do not believe.

    It is not unlike calling a person a theological conservative or liberal. In different parts of the country the two words can mean very different things.

    Same with political philosophies. Where I worked I was considered a liberal. Where my wife worked I was considered right of Attlla the Hun. Figure that one out.
    O O
     

Share This Page

Loading...