1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Tancredo: Take out their holy sites

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by LadyEagle, Jul 13, 2007.

  1. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    ............
     
  2. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0

    Militarized police? Sounds like you want your cake and eat it to. Law enforcement has its limits on the high end of force. The military has its limits on the low end of force. Hence, the reason the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement, as it should be. Terrorists are more equpped than the mission of civilian law enforcement provides for. we can militarize the civil law enforcement but then all you have is the military policing the streets. The separation of missions is a chacks and balance in our system.
     
  3. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Actually if you look around a bit you may notice we already have a militarized police state. What's it used for? Protecting us or intimidating us?

    That's all changing fast isn't it?


    Then why is it being used to police the world?


    If it cannot be used for civil law enforment then why is it? See New Oleans after Katrina. Not only was our military used to police citizens so were foreign militaries. Posse Commitatus? What a joke! Bush wants to get rid of that too and if he can't he'll just ignore it and the people let him.


    Maybe if our own intell and law enforcement agencies stopped protecting, equipping and using them for provacatuers that wouldn't be the case.


    We already have that. Or didn't you notice that at the last RNC in NYC?


    That's an illusion. It may have been that way in history but now the military is training side by side police and working along side them. That isn't supposed to be happening. That is the law. But it's being ignored like so many others. You do know why Posse Commitatus was enacted in 1878 don't you?
     
    #83 poncho, Jul 21, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 21, 2007
  4. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0
    After Hurricane Charlie blew threw here on 04 we had a curfew and the national guard walked the streets for months. But the National guard can be called out in special circumstances when the local law enforcement is overwhelmed in natural disasters. But that has to meet certain criteria.
     
  5. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Had the same thing in my home town when the flood hit in 1972. We didn't have foreign military there and we didn't have mercenaries patrolling the streets either.

    The National Guard wasn't confiscating guns from law abiding citizens then either come to think of it. When is the last time you can think of that foreign militaries and private mercenaries were used to police United States citizens? Is that constitutional? Is mass gun confiscation constitutional?
     
Loading...