Featured Terrorism Deaths Quadruple Under Obama

Not hardly. The OP does not say it's Obama's fault.

 

That's my opinion. Not part of the OP.

 

OTOH maybe you should sharpen up on your critical reading skills.

 

He can't. The OP doesn't say that.

 

I disagree. It's my thread and I say the OP is the opening post. I don't use "internet slang" all that much.

The point you are trying to make is dead. Try again.

 

Not all. Just the ones that go off into racial and left wing rants when you start calling other members here names that shouldn't be allowed on any board, let alone a christian one , but are.

 

Let's see, Isis has been responsible for God knows how many terrorist killings in the past few years. But there were only 700 of them in 2008. Now there are over 20,0000. Wonder how many terrorist acts they would have committed if there were only 700? Fewer, one would think.

But with Obama's idiotic and precipitous withdrawal from Iraq coupled with his arming of Isis in the hopes some of them would fight against Assad and his phony bombing campaign against Isis, one would have to conclude this moron is responsible for thousands of crimes against humanity committed by isis.

In particular they are murdering every Christian they can find and Obama is mute on the subject. As are the leftists here on BB.

Yes, Obama bears a huge portion of the responsibility for the radical increase in terrorist killings since he has been in office...even if one just considers those committed by Isis.

 

C

I guess he thinks it matters to the adults. Rolleyes

 

Talk is cheap.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...sm-summit-islam-muslim-faith-column/23632171/

Obama's religious blindness aids Islamic State


At this week's White House summit on combating violent extremism on social media, all topics are fair game except Islamist extremism. From the administration's point of view, it may as well not even exist, despite the fact that the first I in ISIS and ISIL stands for "Islamic", as in Islamic State.

The White House has consistently downplayed, if not outright ignored, the religious dimension of the war on terrorism. This has much to do with President Obama's apparent belief that any mention of Islam in the context of terrorism will reinforce negative views of the United States abroad, and supposed American prejudices against Muslims.


Attempts to avoid touching on religious dimension of the struggle has led to several recent high-profile administration gaffes. President Obama strangely tried to deflect the issue at the National Prayer Breakfast on Feb. 5 by mentioning the Crusades as an example of Christian excess. Unfortunately, that example is also a key jihadist talking point.

snip
In an interview published days later, Obama downplayed the religious aspect of a terrorist attack on a kosher deli in Paris that specifically targeted French Jews, saying the perpetrator "randomly (shot) a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris."

snip
The White House made a similar blunder in a statement condemning last week's ISIL beaheading of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians in Libya, referring to them only as "Egyptian citizens" and stressing that ISIL attacks are "unconstrained by faith, sect, or ethnicity."

snip
Yet the Obama administration consistently sends the message that it either does not comprehend or refuses to accept the nature of the struggle. Any strategy not based on the facts is a recipe for failure.