That debilitating disease - atheist darwinism: What say you?

On this thread - it was pointed out that the reason-debiiltating faith-destroying Gospel-contradicting disease "Atheist Darwinism" took a once-believer like Darwin and turned him into an atheist (agnostic at best) --

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=822209&postcount=12

On this thread we saw UTETOW falter then fail then totally implode in all areas of reason as argument after argument in favor of atheist darwinism was fully exposed at a level that even a child could quickly grasp!

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=823682&postcount=177
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=822073#post822073

He simply adopts a "rant and run" even when it comes to his own initiatives!

There we saw an entire series of links on this board exposing his complete failure to deal with facts when there is "no place to hide".

---

On this thread and post UTEOTW claims that he is not uniquely failing to show logic and reason - he states here that there are a number who privately indicate via PM that they too would take his path.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=822498&postcount=170
---

Here we see belief in atheist darwinism leading UTEOTW to deny Romans 1 regarding what is "clearly SEEN in the things that have been Made" by unbelieving pagans!! Romans 1

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=808250&postcount=96

----

Was Darwin RIGHT to SEE that his atheist views lead away from truth, fact, light and the Bible?

Is Dawkins right when HE TOO shows how this contradiction between the Word of God and atheist darwinism " is CLEARLY SEEN" even by atheists?

Is Patterson right when he claims that faith in atheist darwinism is really a kind of "anti knowledge"??

When darwinist here run away from Romans 1, logic, reason and rational thought - do they SHOW the glaring results of having adopted faith in the system starts with "there is no God" - to the point that they strenuously object TO EVOLUTIONISTS that want to admit to seeing "CLEARLY things IN NATURE that reveal the invisible attributes of a higher intelligence"??

Would you be willing to add the lethal mix of atheist darwinism to the Gospel - to your church leadership, to any Christian expected to hold to rational thought?

Or are all these sources and examples merely "so many more data points to ignore"??

What say you?

In Christ,

Bob

 

Sadly - it appears from Romans 1 and from statements by people such as Dr Dawkins that pagans and atheist "see clearly" what compromised Christians clinging to atheist darwinism "anyway" say they "Fail to see".

Richard Dawkins is Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He is the author of many books including the international best-sellers "The Selfish Gene", "The Blind Watchmaker", and "Climbing Mount Improbable."

FROM : http://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/transcript/dawk-frame.html
Excerpt –

(Note for the Reader: In the above quote Dawkins argues that Christian evolutionist think “God does something”, that “God contributes something” to the subject of origins. And on that point alone – Dawkins argues for the inconsistency and flawed logic of so-called-christian-evolutionism.

Christian evolutionist sometimes argue against Dawkins claiming that HE has made too much of a grandiose claim about what Christian-evolutionists think God is doing. In essence those Christian evolutionists argue that Dawkins has to HIGH a view of God!!

How sad that Christian evolutionists are prone to going to such extremes.)

Here we see a thread where UTEOTW tries the "lowered expectations of God" approach such that blind believe in fully formed living cells from nothing (as hoped by atheists) is to be believed OVER the Word of our Creator God not matter how improbable those atheist beliefs are!

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=822098#post822098

 

I just saw a program from Coral Ridge Ministries - (Dr D. James Kennedy) entitled "The Root of the Problem" - where he is emphatic that this disease we call atheist darwinism provided the basis for the "super race" concept of Hitler.

So I suppose there is "one other" who recognizes the cancer within the body of the Christian Church.

Next.

 

I take It you too are a believer in atheist darwinism. How else could you be so bent away from fact and married to fiction as in the transparently glaring example above!!

Where were you when UTEOTW was floundering in his own failed arguments on those threads provided? Why didn't anyone from your camp save him from disgracing himsefl in blunder after blunder?!! You guys should at the very least have some sense of integrity - enough to have saved him from that horrible demonstration he put on.

 

"Running" - defined as devastating point after devastating point raised against your failed and bogus rabbit trails exposing them so fully on this board that even a CHILD could easily master the discussion and STILL you came back with the vaccuous response of the form "I have no more to contribute so I am running away".

Frankly I am surprised that following a showing like that you have any inclination to post on those topics even if it is to just "rant and run" again.

BUT SHOULD you ever have an ounce of interest in the ACTUAL DETAILS that were repeatedly shown to debunk your non-truths - feel free to actually PROVIDE data - rather than more ranting vaccous claims that "you probably did well at one time".

I have no problem comparing the data - you on the other hand run away so often that the thread ends with me saying "UTEOTW where ARE you.....?" after posting a series of devastating points to which you had NO answer!!

 

AFter failing to even address the CONTEXT and CONTENT of your OWN selected quotes (as in the case of Patterson and Talk Origins) THOUGH it is EXPLICITLY pointed out to you - - you vaccuously assert "My actual argument, then, still stand tall and unrefuted"

I am sorry but that does fit the defintion of the term you used earlier -- "pathetic"

 

Here again we have evidence so blatant so glaring so transparent that a child reading this thread easily SEES IT!!

Notice the points raised in the first two posts? Notice the evidence from Darwin himself. Notice the evidence from Richard Dawkins -- NOT A SINGLE point dealt with so far by the post of atheist darwinist believers so far. NOT ONE!!!

Thus they SHOW ON THIS THREAD -- that they have no stomach for details or compelling response.

In fact BOTH posts from atheist darwinist believers highlighted total falsehood as the CENTER of their response.

Can the reader really not see such an obvious glaring fact NOW provided AGAIN on this thread as the believers in atheist darwinism sugggest? I assert that the reader sees it not ONLY on those threads but also sees it in the content provided AGAIN here in the data above in 9 short post sequences!!

The atheist darwinist cultists can not HELP but demonstrate the problem!!

 

Oops! "oh yeah we denounce Johnson like we denounce D.J. Kennedy" ---

Forgot the vaccuous response mode thing is probably still turned on for the atheist darwinist faithful.

 

Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly. 1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exists; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent. ~ William Provine

Evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented. ~ William Provine

 

CHARLES ROBERT DARWIN stands among the giants of Western thought because he convinced a majority of his peers that all of life shares a single, if complex, history. He taught us that we can understand life’s history in purely naturalistic terms, without recourse to the supernatural or divine. ~ Niles Eldredge

For Darwin, any evolution that had to be helped over the jumps by God was no evolution at all. It made a nonsense of the central point of evolution. ~ Richard Dawkins

 

There is NO point in which all variables are known (as in the case of this thread) where believers in atheist darwinism can stand up to the data and deal with it intelligently.

This thread is just proviing that in living color as did the other threads pointed out in the first two posts on this thread!!

The question of the OP remains - do you really think that this "cancer within" can be ignored or will you along with D. James Kennedy admit that the nonsense of atheist darwinism has to be fully exposed?

In Christ,

Bob

 

The atheist readily admits to the SAME problem that the Bible believing Christian sees when it comes to the religion of atheist darwinism and its efforts to REDEFINE science such that it is enlsaved axiomatically to the doctrine "THERE IS NO GOD"..

 

The point is that you can not attack anyone who exposes the blunders of atheist darwinism as they are being "inserted" into the body of Christianity - just because "you also do not like something else they do" and have no consequence.

At some point - it is time for Christians to wake up!! I am obviously not a Pesbyterian and I have obviously posted against infant baptism etc - but that does not mean I can not fully support a RIGHT focus on truth and light EVEN if it comes from a Presbyterian!!