1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured The Blessedness - Romans 4:6-8

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by The Biblicist, Jun 28, 2012.

  1. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

    Verse three speaks of Abraham.
    Verse five starts with the word But, indicating a contrast from the believing Abraham to the unbeliever who is not justified. It says what it says; it means what it says:
    The unbeliever who does no work, obeys not, but simply believes on God (Christ), that man is justified and his faith is counted for righteousness. God has given him a standing of righteousness because of his faith in God. He is justified by faith alone; no works involved.
    Salvation is by faith alone, and not of any kind of works: works of the law, good works, not any kind of works. This is what the passage is teaching. To him that works not, but believes on him that justifies the ungodly...
    The Scriptures do not indicate that circumcision was included in any of the works that Abraham did. The "works of the law," came long after Abraham's life. Circumcision is not what is referred to here. In the larger scope of his life it is a rather insignificant event.
    Romans 4:1-2 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

    What is being referred to here?
    The fact that Abraham by faith left Ur of the Chaldees.
    He went to a place where he knew not where he was going.
    He dwelt in tents, lived a nomadic life, according to the will of God.
    He grew old, Sarah past the time of her life, and yet still held to the promise that God would give them a son.
    When given a son he was told to sacrifice him.
    He sacrificed him; but God provided a substitute as the knife was about to fall.
    He continued to walk with God.
    He rescued his nephew Lot with 315 of his own hired servants.

    And the story of his life goes on and on. His works can be counted. They seem to be numberless. Circumcision was not one of them. That is not what people saw in the works of Abraham. They saw a man who walked by faith; a man who was called "The Friend of God."

    But if Abraham boasted in his own works, he could not glory.
    Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
    --The works were all a result of his belief in God. Abraham's faith counted him righteous. He was made righteous because he had put his faith in the Lord.
    Why do you harp on circumcision. Abraham lived ca. 2100, and Moses ca. 4,000, almost 2,000 years after the time of Abraham. Abraham came long before the law. Circumcision had nothing to do with the salvation of Abraham. Abraham was saved by faith and faith alone. If you don't believe that then you reject the Scripture:

    Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
    --There is nothing about obedience; nothing about circumcision.
    Faith is not a work. Therefore there is no personal participation.

    Romans 4:18-21 Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations; according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be. And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sara's womb: He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform.
    The last part of this verse is one of the best definitions of faith in the Bible.
    It is "being fully persuaded that what God has promised, God will do."
    Thus faith is not a work.
    It is not participation with God. It is a simple belief and trust that God will accomplish what he has promised. That is what God did. He did it all without Abraham's help. God kept his promise to Abraham. Abraham did nothing. It was all of grace.
    What is that supposed to mean.
    Does God have a big chalk board, and every time you show a little bit of faith in him, He says, "good for you Moriah," and puts up a mark on the chalk board for you. Then when you get to heaven you can count all that you have "merited" in heaven. Salvation by works is heresy.
     
  2. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    There is a difference between "comparison" and "inclusion"! I did not compare you to the Catholics but I included you with the Catholics because you both respond the very same way.
     
  3. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    No one trotted out the cultist charge. What I said referred to the METHOD of hermeneutics being used by you and Moriah and the Catholics. What I said is true and you demonstrate it every time you respond. Neither of you can deal with the Biblical text in an exegetical fashion - that is self-evident - just look at your responses.
     
  4. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    No way is the man who “obeys not” in right standing with God. YOU ADDED TO THE WORD OF GOD WHEN YOU SAID the Bible says what is says, and means what it says; then you say, “The unbeliever who does no work, obeys not, but simply believes on God (Christ), that man is justified and his faith is counted for righteousness.” I can hardly believe I am reading this from you.

    God gave to Abraham the work of circumcision as a seal of his faith! Abraham believed AND OBEYED GOD EVEN BEFORE THIS. When did Abraham go where God said to go, was it before or after circumcision? It was before circumcision!

    Why would God and Jesus make their home with someone who does not obey? Jesus says the Father and he will make their home with those who obey! See John 14:23.

    Are you kidding? The Bible SPEAKS of whether Abraham was justified BEFORE or AFTER CIRCUMCISION!
    The Bible SAYS CIRCUMCISION.

    The Bible does not say Abraham was justified before he obeyed God and went to where God said to go! In fact, the Bible tells us that BY FAITH ABRAHAM MADE AN ACTION. BY FAITH, Abraham went where God said to go. BY FAITH, Abraham offered Isaac as a sacrifice.

    Ask yourself this, did God nail obeying Him to the cross? NO! Did God nail circumcision of the flesh to the cross? YES!

    If a person does not have a mind and heart set on obeying God, if a person does not obey God, then how that person is different from Satan is something you need to explain.


    Faith IS a personal participation.

    I have an unwavering faith. I do not doubt.

    How is it that you do not see it as wrong to teach no obedience to God and Jesus in order to be saved?
     
  5. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have dealt with the Biblical text that way; you just cannot accept it because that would upset the applecart of your being able to infallibly interpret scripture -- infallibly in your own mind, that is.
     
  6. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    1. Salvation is by faith and faith alone.
    2. Salvation is not by works. That teaching is your teaching and is heresy.
    3. Salvation is by grace through faith...not of works. You deny the Scripture.
    4. We are justified by faith and therefore have peace with God. (Rom.5:1) You deny this Scripture.
    5. Abraham believed God and righteousness was imputed unto him. You deny this Scripture.

    You deny the totality of Scripture which teaches that salvation is by faith and not of works. It is not of obedience (works), it is of faith. Why do you deny the Bible?
     
  7. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    No such distinction is made in Romans 4:1-25. You are simply misinterpreting what Paul says.

    Rom. 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
    6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works
    ,

    First, all the verbs in these two verses are in the present tense showing identifical or simeltaneous action with each other and all modify the "ungodly."

    Believing, justifying and imputeth are all simeltaneous actions that are all "WITHOUT WORKS" and descriptive of the "ungodly" person. Hence, the righteousness is derived from an external source as the person being justified, beliving and being imputed righteousness is "ungodly." An "ungodly" person cannot be the source of righteousness. Neither can his works be the source of righteousness by the very fact he is believing "without works" or "worketh not."

    The righteousness is related to "his faith" (not faithfulness as that is being denied by the fact his state is "ungodlly" and it is "without works.").

    The righteousnesss is found in the OBJECT of His faith or in the Person and work of Jesus Christ EXTERNAL to himself ("ungodly") and EXTERNAL to his own works ("worketh not" "without works").

    You cannot simply dissect this text from its context and make if mean what you want it to mean. The "faith" in question has already been defined in the introduction in Romans 3:24-26 and in the application in Romans 4:21-25. The righteousness obtained by faith is found "in" the object of that faith or in the Person and works of Jesus Christ:

    Rom. 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
    25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
    26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.


    Paul merely introduces Abraham to illustrate this introductory assertion! This is also proven by the APPLICATION of Abraham's faith in Romans 4:21-25 in the conclusion of this illustration:

    21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform.
    22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.
    23 ¶ Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;
    24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him
    that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
    25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.


    For your position to be true in this context one would have to get rid of the term "ungodly" and replace it with "godly" and get rid "worketh not" and "without works" and replace it with "works of righteousness."

    Moreover the SAME Greek term is translated "imputeth" and "counted" and "reckoned" and so you theological distinction between "imputeth" and "reckoned" is false.


    Here is your problem! You need to get your theology from the Scripture not from TRADITIONS of men and uninspired church history.

    You are not fighting me! You are fighting the Apostle Paul. He is the one that used the SAME Greek term for all three words (counteth, imputeth, reckoned). He is the one that defines the person needing justified as "ungodly." He is the one that defines "righteousness" received by faith to be EXTERNAL to the person being justified by claiming his person to be "ungodly" and his justification is "without works" and "worketh not".

    Your problem is with Paul! You need to stop getting your theology from secular traditions of men and start getting from the scriptures based upon EXEGESIS rather than EISGESIS!
     
  8. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    DHK,

    You should go and reply to each of my comments, for you speak of me doing that, why do you not? You rarely, if ever address what I say to you.
     
  9. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can hardly believe what you say. How can anybody preach no obedience?

    James says faith without action is dead.

    You teach dead faith. You teach that dead faith is the kind that saves!
     
  10. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even the demons believe that there is One God; they believe this while they have the shuddering action.

    I can hardly believe that you teach us not to obey to be saved.

    James 2:22 You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.

    James 2:17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

    James 2:19 You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that--and shudder.
     
    #70 Moriah, Jul 8, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 8, 2012
  11. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is what you are doing, not I. Your interpretation is colored by the Magisterial Reformers. I am interpreting the scripture literally, then showing how the earliest churches, the Eastern church, and the Anabaptists viewed it. Forensic justification and imputed righteousness were invented by the Magisterial Reformers whose doctrines were as false as those of the RCC -- more so, in some cases.
     
  12. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Impossible! I have NEVER read them or their interpretations. Rediculous as I am pointing out the terms and grammar provided by Paul not the Reformers.



    That is simply a lie! You have offered NO CONTEXTUAL BASED repudiation of my exposition of Romans and neither have you provided any CONTEXTUAL BASED exposition to support your position! So what you are claiming is an utter IMPOSSIBILITY! The truth is that you have offered NOTHING Bibilical based but only your own UNPROVEN ASSERTIONS backed by TRADITIONS! All you do is reference Post-Biblical positions by some Anabaptists in contrast to Protestant Reformers neither of which are inspired.

    Your theology comes from read uninspired books not the scriptures and it is easy to prove it as you offer NOTHING THAT IS EXEGETICALLY BASED to support you assertions.
     
  13. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    You NEVER deal with the Biblical evidence placed before you! You ALWAYS flee to TRADITIONS of men to support your case.

    Deal with the contextual based Biblical data I presented you from Romans 4. I gave you precisely what Paul said and you cannot refute what I presented or you would have pointed out the errors in grammar or terms or context. So you flee to YOUR FINAL AUTHORITY - traditions of men just as the Catholics do!

    Shut my mouth and DEAL with the Biblical data and Biblical based arguments I presented based upon EXEGETICAL data right out of the text.
     
  14. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Biblicist,

    Stop accusing Michael of things he does not do.

    Man it gets old to hear that unfounded nonsense as a defense to debating doctrine and sharing our beliefs.
     
  15. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Moriah, what is the object of your faith? Yourself? Satan? Christ?
    The object of the demons faith was not God; it was Satan himself, and therefore they were not saved. They shuddered at the awesome power of God and the knowledge they had of the end of the world. But they were followers of another leader, Satan. That was the object of their faith.

    I "believe" that Nero existed and did the terrible things that he did. But he is not the object of my faith. Nor does he make me shudder. The object of my faith is Christ. He is my Lord and King; to him I am subservient. Please use the word correctly.
     
  16. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have done that repeatedly; it's not my fault that you are too blind to see it and too undiscerning to recognize it. I started with scripture, and then I showed how the earliest churches, the Eastern church, and the Anabaptists agreed, and how it was the Magisterial Reformers invented unbiblical doctrines.

    There is a vast difference in reckoning our faith as righteousness as the scripture teaches, and attributing or imputing a false righteousness based on a legal transaction. The latter is a false doctrine which leads to another false doctrine -- forensic justification. It is I who start with scripture -- the literal rendering -- and then show how this view is upheld in the earliest churches, Eastern Christianity, and the Anabaptists; you, on the other hand, interpret through the lenses of the Magistetrial Reformers and thus cannot help but coming up with the wrong view.
     
  17. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am used to it; that's all he and some others can do.
     
  18. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    How do the Catholics explain the practice of baptising infants in light of Matt 28:18-20?
     
  19. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    My faith is in God.

    Who said the demons were saved?

    How do you bring Nero into this discussion?

    I see you have a hard time understanding.

    Let me try again. I love to tell you.

    James says faith without action is dead.

    Do you get that?

    You teach such faith is a saving faith.

    How do you not see the error in that?

    You teach the dead faith James tells us about is a saving faith.

    James says even the demons believe and shudder. Shuddering is an action that the demons do.

    Even the demons believe and have an action.

    YOU teach that we are NOT to obey, that we are not to have any action on our part, and you say to believe otherwise is a false teaching worthy of condemnation.

    Do you get it now?
     
  20. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    If that were true then you could easily respond to these simple and clear contextual based evidences that repudiate your position. If that were true you wouldn't make such a foolish distinction between "imputation" and "reckoned" as both translates the very same Greek term.

    If that were true we could find such a response on this thread but we cannot!

    The truth is you have NEVER provided a Biblical based refutation of these simple contextual facts.


    DEMONSTRATE don't make unfounded ASSERTIONS!
     
Loading...