The Immorality of Obamanomics

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mandym, May 6, 2012.

  1. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://spectator.org/archives/2012/05/02/the-immorality-of-obamanomics
     
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    298
    Obama's class warfare would end if everyone really knows these numbers...unless the goal is just outright theft and the destruction of the American economy.

     
  3. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Since when has it been considered just for the bottom 99 percent to say to the top 1 percent, "We can outvote you to take your money"? That is a politics of piracy and theft, with no roots in American history."

    Does anyone else besides myself understand that income distribution is NOT a bell curve and the social/political implications?

    No one else understands that "middle class" means the middle section of the poor people?

    Isn't rich and poor like moral and immoral, good and bad? A comparison of the ends of a scale?

    THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

    Say a 12 inch ruler was re-scaled with the federal minimum wage times 2080 hours (standard work year) on the left end and Bill Gate's annual gross capital gains on the right end. Then the ruler was placed on a long sheet of paper and a dot was placed below every family's income.

    How many inches from the left end would median family income be located?
     
  4. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesn't matter. You personally may not like how many rich people are in the world but using government to transfer wealth is immoral no matter what the problem is.
     
  5. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    You are correct. It happened in Nazi Germany - the Jews had their wealth confiscated and as much as 30% of the German war effort was financed by Jewish confiscated wealth. If the government can confiscate or transfer a rich man's wealth, it can do the same to anyone. We are supposed to be FREE and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

    We would do well to revisit German/Nazi history and note the parallels coming to pass in the USA.

    From Wikipedia:
     
    #5 LadyEagle, May 7, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2012
  6. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Frankly carpro I believe bigO's goal is the destruction of the country. He is a toady of George Soros who wants the same thing!
     
  7. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,179
    Likes Received:
    325
    Not the destruction OR, but sovereign control, - a serfdom.


    HankD
     
  8. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    The neo-serf is not attached to the land but is dependent upon the corporation oligarchy for his work and pay. The corporations don't care for whom we work, who we marry, where we live, how many guns we own . . . as long as net assets keep flowing from the workers to the owners.
     
  9. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    And that makes the stockholders happy and all those who have 401(k) increase in value which they hope to use for retirement. Nothing wrong with being dependent upon a corporation for work and pay, especially when that corporation is making money, because that helps the workers have job security to feed their families, buy homes, buy cars, buy electronics, keep on the heat and lights, and more! The Free Market is wonderful and our nation is the envy of the world because someone can come here with just the shirt on their back, work hard, and end up with an IPO. At least, that's the way it used to work before the "fundamental transformation of America."
     
  10. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,179
    Likes Received:
    325
    We are a 21st century serfdom:

    We are attached to the bank which holds the mortgage to the property.
    We are attached to the county which expects a rental payment every year (disguised as a "property" tax).

    This administration wants us to work for them.

    They also want us to approve same-gender marriage.

    If we do marry cross-gender they expect us to murder our kids in the womb.

    They don't like our guns or our bibles and they particularly don't like us clinging to our guns and bibles (in lieu of clinging to them) for security and protection from criminals.

    HankD
     
  11. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    298
    I don't have any problem believing you may be right.

    The evidence definitely points in that direction.
     
  12. AresMan

    AresMan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    According to leftist logic, it is evil for someone to put a gun to another's head and force him to give up his wealth; however, if that same thief uses a proxy to do the exact same thing, it is not only not evil it is good and moral and necessary.

    The proxy is the government.

    And, no, 50%+1 does not make anything properly "of the people." If 50%+1 of the population can vote away the rights and property of the 50%-1 minority, then this minority is enslaved and their voice is never heard. This is why a constitutional republic is important. The supreme law of the land should recognize individual rights to life, liberty, and property and there should be "no law" by anyone that can take such things away. Democracy should only function in rearranging the deck chairs of political offices for upholding the constitution, not for allowing the majority free reign to trample on the rights, property, and livelihood of the minority.
     

Share This Page

Loading...