The Libel Laws Are Dead

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Bro. Curtis, Jul 2, 2014.

  1. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,250
    Likes Received:
    4
    ….Zimmerman had filed suit two years ago, accusing NBC of falsely portraying him as a racist in a series of broadcasts shortly after he killed Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black 17-year-old, in Sanford.

    Editors shortened audio from a 911 call Zimmerman made to a police dispatcher the night of the shooting, making it sound as if Zimmerman volunteered that Trayvon was black and that he racially profiled the Miami Gardens teenager.

    Those edited clips aired four times in March 2012.

    In addition, Zimmerman accused the news organization of defaming him in a separate broadcast by falsely reporting that he used a racial epithet in the same call.

    The network fired two employees who were involved in the edits and made a public apology.

    At a hearing June 19, NBC attorney Lee Levine asked the judge to end the suit with a judgment in the network's favor.

    Zimmerman is a public figure, Levine said, and could not prove that he was the victim of "actual malice", meaning that NBC employees either knew what they reported was false or had serious misgivings about it.

    In her ruling, issued shortly before 9 a.m. today, Nelson wrote that that's where Zimmerman's suit fell apart.

    "There exists absolutely no clear and convincing evidence that defendants knew that the information published was false at the time it was published, or recklessly disregarded the truth or falsity of those statements. …," she wrote.

    Zimmerman also alleged that the network intentionally inflicted emotional distress. Nelson shot down that claim, too.

    In her 15-page order, she pointed out that time and again in March 2012 - the period during which Zimmerman claims NBC defamed him – the network quoted family members and friends who emphasized that Zimmerman was not a racist.

    She also picked up on a tiny detail from the 911 call: that midway through the conversation, Zimmerman pointed out Trayvon's race a second time, and that time it was without prompting.

    "He's got his hand in his waistband. And he's a black male," the then-Neighborhood Watch volunteer said.

    The edits, the judge wrote, were not material changes.

    As for the racial epithet, the judge wrote that the FBI did an analysis of the recording and concluded it was impossible to make out what Zimmerman had said. Given that, she wrote, it would be impossible for him to prove that NBC got that fact wrong.


    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...merman-nbc-suit-dead-20140630,0,1401290.story
     
  2. Zaac

    Zaac
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    220
    They're still alive. Judges are just doing as they always have. It seems as though it's always difficult to really prove a libel case.
     
  3. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Typical liberal judge taking case law into her own hands and rewriting it. My guess is, the lawsuit gets reinstated on appeal.
     
  4. Zaac

    Zaac
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    220
    Thank Jeb Bush .
     
  5. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,250
    Likes Received:
    4
    My thoughts exactly. If they had to fire two people over a pre-approved broadcast, they knowingly lied about the man. It will be overturned.
     

Share This Page

Loading...