The Logic of BRAPSIS

While that certainly has been the norm, Baptists have recognized other ordinances, such as foot washing and even hymn singing and laying on of hands (Philadelphia Baptist Confession, one of the most influential American Baptist confessions.) Certainly baptism and the Lord's Supper have had a preeminent place, but other ordinances have been observed.

To me, the nonsacramental aspect of the ordinances is more important than the number.

Now as to S2 — I think that is essentially correct, though it is not so true today as in times past. Baptists have traditionally been separationists; those who didn't separate became something else (like so many of the English Generals who dissolved into Unitarianism or the American Baptists who became Campbellites.)

Baptists have not always agreed upon the bounds of separation, but I think the impulse has been strong, which explains the number of splits, resurgences, etc. among Baptists. Even today, Baptists as a whole are less ecumenical than many other brands of Christians.

I think this will continue to be the case, although many Baptists' standards of separation will not meet with approval from some other Baptists. The recent decision of the GARBC to disassociate from Cedarville University shows the differing views of Baptists about separation and the lengths to which it should be carried.

One other thing — Did I miss something in the article about congregational polity?