Featured The Myth of Russian Aggression

Making more claims you can't back up with evidence now? Is that supposed to give you "credibility"?

Bearing false witness is becoming quite the habit with you lately CMG. You must be desperate to believe your own propaganda over all the facts and evidence. So sad.

 

Connect the dots? You mean like Washington being behind the overthrow of the Ukrainian government? Yeah, I connected those dots with evidence even, which is more than you have even attempted to do.

That would make Washington and the neocons that have infested it the "aggressor" in this yet another hair brained neocon regime change plot that's doomed to failure like all the others and there's a long long line of failed regime change plots going back to Iran in 1953 which ultimately, failed. Libya. Failed! Syria. Failed! Iraq, Failed!

Don't you care that the people you follow are insane psychopaths that have caused the deaths of millions of people and the destruction of our own country? Your neocon heros have more blood on their hands than anyone they accuse of being a murderer.

 

:laugh: Always stay true to form eh? Whatever Poncho says turn it around 180 degrees and bluff. :laugh:

Obama works for the neocons, not the other way around. I only bring it up because there's reams of documents and mainstream news articles that provide enough evidence to make your own paranoid fear based conspiracy theory look silly by comparison. Which as you and I both know is why you have to keep refusing to look at them and keep on playing the role of the paranoid fear/hate monger.

As if that can stop the truth from getting out. News Flash partner, it ain't working anymore. Your guys have lied and conducted one to many failed regime changes using the same old lies and propaganda.

They sound like a broken record. Man, they don't even bother to tell new lies they just keep recycling the old ones over and over and over again.

 

Like your guys don't? Mr. Pot meet Mr. Kettle.


Wall Street Vs. Russia

Wall Street's poorly hidden, poorly coordinated agenda in Russia. Who is behind it?

1. Wall Street-London's Defense Team for Jailed Russian Oligarch Khodorkovsky

The background of jailed Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his "Open Russian Foundation" fashioned after George Soros' Open Society Institute and chaired by both Jacob Rothschild and Henry Kissinger, can be found in William Engdahl's, "The Real Crime of M. Khodorkovsky," as well as in the London Telegraph's humorously titled, "This man is now the people's billionaire," reflecting the paid-for rhetoric of Khodorkovsky's Wall Street-London-appointed lawyer Robert Amsterdam.

In the latest round of attempted destabilization in Russia, it may be instructive to look at the "Khodorkovsky & Lebedev Communications Center," a website developed in part by Robert Amsterdam and what is called an "international legal team." Coincidentally, it fully embraces the narrative peddled by the West and its corporate media that the Russian elections were "rigged." However, this accusation tenuously hinges on the work of US-funded NGOs including Golos - fully funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

Just as Robert Amsterdam is doing in Thailand, where he is using his "defense" of ousted prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra as a point of leverage to in fact induce regime change in the Southeast Asian country, his defense of Khodorkovsky also aims not at defending his client legally, but at using his case to undermine and ultimately overturn the leadership of Russia. It is done in a concerted effort with the US State Department, the corporate media, and a vast network of US and European subsidized NGOs sowing sedition within Russia itself.

khodorkovskycenter.com

2. Neo-Conservatives Attempting to Encircle Russia with NATO

The Neo-Conservative Foreign Policy Initiative, whose membership has helped engineer and promote every war in at least the last 30 years of American history, clearly enumerates what it believes the next steps the US should take toward Russia should be. These include continuing the encirclement of Russia with NATO and its controversial "missile defense" efforts, continuing to build up the Republic of Georgia as a menacing proxy-threat lying on Russia's borders, and "supporting human rights" focusing on the "Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2011" which seeks yet again to sanction members of the Russian government based on disingenuous "human rights" concerns, just as the FPI and its collaborators did in Libya.

Read More At: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/12/wall-street-vs-russia.html


This is what you call "connecting the dots" CMG.

 

Perhaps if you post the link to the thread you asked me this question I could point you to my answer.

 

CMG has accused me of supporting people and things I do not support on several occasions over the years. That's how he get's around having to admit his neocon heros are responsible for the death and displacement of millions of people during their failed regime change attempts.

That's called bearing false witness. I don't care if you like it or not. God said it ain't right and I agree. At what point did God tell us we should think and act like the world does?

 

My buddy calls this the curse of knowledge. I assume you guys have read all my posts and the thousands of articles, documents, videos and whatever else I've posted in the ten years I've been here.

I also assume that you guys have started to catch on to how the government has lied to us about the need to go and attack this that and the other guy over the last 100 years.

Apparently I'm wrong. I can look at an article in the land destroyer and connect it with all the declassified government documents, news articles and other forms of evidence from what you call "legitimate" sources that tend to back up what he's saying.

And there is a lot of evidence to back it up. Unfortunately the average American can't remember what they had for breakfast let alone remember how they were neoconned into giving up on the conservative limit government movement that was replaced with the need for "endless war" theory.

Do you even remember what it used to mean to be a conservative or has this neoconservative ideology of all war all the time everywhere because everyone else but us is evil and needs to be killed wiped it from your memory?

Conservatives used to be about finding other ways of dealing with other nations besides blowing them up and killing millions of people.