The NKJV: the purest of the King James tradition

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by Greektim, Feb 13, 2014.

  1. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Don't agree? Prove it! Don't just compare translations. Show me where it is inferior to the KJV either textually (this will never happen) or in its translation.
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,114
    Likes Received:
    52
    isn't the NKJV based upon same greek/hebrew texts as the Kjv is, and the margins in it give varients and readings at times also from CT/MT texts?

    So really kjv made current, with textual info on other greek texts available to translate off from?
     
  3. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Yep... kinda like the 1611.
     
  4. glazer1972

    glazer1972
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love mine but the church I'm in now uses esv.
     
  5. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,225
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    The NKJV is superior to the KJV in some ways and is inferior in some ways.

    It is superior in the updating of archaic words, grammar, and syntax and with greater consistency in how it translates ketiv/qere pairs.

    It is inferior in the generalizing personal pronouns and in how they translated the present passive participle (slavishly correct but when translated exactly into English it gives a false understanding). The very first thing I learned, 40 years ago, in bonehead Greek 101 was the non-temporal nature of Greek participles.

    But other than that it is an excellent modern English translation that is very true (sometimes too true) to its underlying texts.

    :)
     
  6. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,516
    Likes Received:
    49
    Rather difficult to prove beyond doubt that the NKJV is not the purest version based on the TR. However, the WEB is vastly more pure if we start with the Byzantine Text type. The WEB does not contain many of the well know corruptions of the TR.

    Now it is possible to find single verses that are superior in the KJV when compared with the NKJV, but the vast majority of superior verses stack up on the other side.
     
  7. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    NKJV is better than the KJV...

    I'm tryin' to pick a fight ;)
     
  8. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,114
    Likes Received:
    52
    You have to define WHICH Kjv version first though!

    And what about the "new Kjv" coming out by Charisma publishing now?
     

Share This Page

Loading...