1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The origin of evil and the decrees of God

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Jul 17, 2011.

  1. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Well...

    basically all comes down to this on this subject...

    DID God force/cause satan to rebel, and did He cause/force Adam to Sin?

    That His will is exhaustive, and he indeed as determined ALl things that have occurred
    OR

    DID God KNOW what they would each do, and had already predetermine jost HOW He purposed to "fix the problem" and get glory from it? taht he would use their actions and have it included in Plan to glorify Himself by redeeming back creation and man?
     
  2. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Although I can't yet put my finger exactly on it, there seems to be a logical problem at work here in this proposition, some form of logical fallacy.
     
  3. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,500
    Likes Received:
    2,880
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Makes perfect sense to me. Man, left to his own devices. Do you have faith in man left to his own devices?
     
  4. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,500
    Likes Received:
    2,880
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks for making that distinction for me.
     
  5. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    I have explained this ad nauseum.

    A deed in and of itself has no personality.

    What makes killing murder is the PERSON and his motive in doing the killing.

    This is why I know that you do not understand compatabalism.

    Compatabalism looks at a singular deed and sees TWO WILLS behind it.

    One- the will of God, his motive- is righteous.

    The other- the motive or will of man- is unrighteous.

    If you do not acknowledge that IT refers to the deed, the action and not the sin I will have to conclude that you are being horrifically dishonest and manipulative here.

    I have explained this ad nauseum as well. I believe with John Calvin and all mainstream historic Calvinists in remote and proximate causes.

    That you do not understand what mainstream Calvinism teaches on this matter is no excuse for you to accuse me of being outside the mainstream.

    That God DID IT is appropriate understanding of the affliction of Joseph and Job and Christ within the mainstream Calvinistic understanding of compatabalism is clear for anyone to see.

    I provided this video to prove it. Did you watch it?


    I don't think ANYONE denies the essence of the OP- not Mormons, not Protestants, not Catholics, not Muslims- NO ONE denies it because it is so vague and broad that it is POINTLESS.

    What they do not agree with you on is what you agree with me and the whole of Calvinism on:

    Namely, that nothing, good or bad, happens outside of God's purposes. That God has always intended for everything to happen just as it happens.


    Wrong.

    I have done this above.
     
  6. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,376
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    LOL....that in a nutshell sums it up! Cristal Clear!!!:D
     
  7. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    What needs to be defined is "man's own devices".

    God has given man creation.
    God has written His law into the heart of men.
    God has created man with the desire for life beyond the present.
    God has placed each and every man in the perfect location and place in time to seek Him.

    These are "devices" man has. Do I have faith what God has equipped man with is sufficient? You better believe it!
     
  8. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm not asking you to explain it again. Believe it or not, I understand what you are arguing. I just disagree with it as do Arminians, which is why I know Edwards disagrees with it too.

    On one hand you say you are in agreement with Compatabalism and on the other you say you are in agreement with Arminians and Edwards? Do they agree on this point, and where do they teach this particular point?

    And why do you appeal to mystery regarding the origin of evil, when you believe that "its not evil" when God does it? Why not just say God authored evil, but for a good motive so its not evil?

    You keep avoiding that question Luke and the strongest points of one's argument are not typically reflected in the portion that his opponents address, but in the portions ignored.

    I understand that, but from what I've studied they are arguing in regard to the motive behind what God has permissively decreed to necessarily come to pass in order to accomplish His own Sovereign purposes. They are not arguing in defense of things God has actively done, but for good motives. You are not clear in that distinction.

    I have acknowledged that IT refers to the "DEED" over and over. But IT is a DEED that would be seen as EVIL and you speak of IT in regard to EVERY DEED, even those heinous ones in the context of Dahmer. So, if we apply your own arguments regarding my questions about Dahmer, you would say "Satan did IT - but also God did IT." or "Dahmer did IT, but also God did IT"

    What is IT in this scenario, Luke? Sin. Molestation, rape, murder and cannibalism. So, you are saying when Dahmer did IT he did IT with evil intent so its sin, but you go on to say God did IT too!!! Which is absurd and completely unbiblical and NO CHRISTIAN SCHOLAR worth his salt teaches that. God didn't do that deed. He permitted it for his purpose so that it would certainly come to pass according to his divine foreknowledge and permissive decree, but he didn't "DO IT WITH A PURE MOTIVE." Maybe you mean he allowed it for a PURE motive, which is what I read Compatibilist teaching, but I don't hear them saying God "DID IT" with a pure motive.

    Is that why you have several other Calvinists on this BB who continually take issue with your views (or at least your choice of words)? I suppose they just don't understand Calvinism either, huh?

    I guess only you really understand it, right?

    Again, for God to permit something is often seen as his doing, because He has the ability to prevent it but doesn't. That does NOT mean God actively or does it. This is why clarity is needed in your use of terms. Satan did the evil to Job, but because Job recognized that God permitted it he questions Him as if He is the one who has afflicted him. Calvinists and Arminians alike defend God's sovereignty in his allowing moral evil, but they don't typically do so with the understanding that God is actively "doing it," but instead that He is "allowing it for a purpose" even-though He could have stopped it. You do understand that both of those views need a defense (called a "Theodicy," as you acknowledged). I believe Edwards and the Arminian theodicy is typically very similar, but yours seems to go further for the reasons described above.

    So it would be better to make a statement without defining or specifying my terms as you have? That would make it less vague???

    Why is that wrong, Luke? Do I need to go dig up your quotes that say you are in agreement with Edwards (and the "Arminian divines") and then your quotes which say you are in agreement with "Compatabalism?"

    You claim to be agreement with both, so what did I say that is wrong here?
     
    #68 Skandelon, Jul 20, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 20, 2011
  9. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd like to add to that list:

    - God has sent man an appeal to be reconciled to Him.
    - God has sent his Bride, the church, to proclaim that appeal to every creature.
    - God sent apostles.
    - God inspired, preserved and dispersed the scriptures
    - God indwells his messengers and compels them to go and preach.

    Needless to say, man is not left "to his own devices."
     
Loading...