The Party of Death will not let the Sanctity of Life Bill come to a vote

Thumbs up to Curtis.

 

There is nothing unsupported about it, nor is it an opinion. It is a fact. Roe vs Wade is still the law of the land. You and your fellow liberal Republican apologists blindly vote for a party label that has the same result as the Democrats, also from the pits of hell.

 

I removed your venom.

Stick to the facts.

I will await your proof that Republicans "care nothing about the sanctity of life"...if I should live so long.

Bro. Curtis put it well:

You aim to help them.

 

Interesting that the request in post # 3 was "OJ-ed" (IE: stutter-stepped, dodged, ignored, bypassed--) in a very obvious manner.

The pro-life belief is so strong that he can't even agree to pray to overcome the hellish slaughter; all he could do was blame others for not doing something.

So much for that "personal pro-life stance"!

 

There is no venom. The only fact you need is that Roe v Wade is still the law of the land with Republican control.

I aim to help no one. You are aiding and abetting a party that continues the policy of abortion on demand.

To compromise principles in order to vote for the lesser of two evils is ridiculous. Evil is still evil. If the Republicans had been governing the country like they should have been the last eight years, Obama would not win Nov 4th.

GOP does not stand for "God's Own Party."

 

You don't seem to understand BIR. You aren't pro-life according to these posters definition. And, we all know, if you don't see things just like they do, why you must be wrong! :laugh:

BTW, I hope you are having a good day, I know I am, Thank the Lord!

 

Unfortunately, that is why the republicans will lose this election, both for the White House and the Congress. I'm not saying this will result in any good, but I believe this will be the outcome of this election.

As for me, I may just not vote at all in this election. For me this is unusual because I almost always vote, especially in national elections.

 

Oh please.
I really expected at least a reasonably intelligent response.

Even playing your silly game, your statement is hardly proof that Republicans (an all inclusive statement) care nothing about the "sanctity of life".

I personally know plenty of them that do. If you'll be honest with yourself, you do to.

Wanna try again? This time , lose the hateful attitude and just admit your statement is a pretty gross exaggeration.

 

I don't believe this is Biblically correct. Scripture gives many examples of God judging nations for the evil they do and allow, including child sacrifice. Replacing the God Convenience for the God Molech doesn't seem a big change.

 

Hello? Has BiR left the building? Any explanation on the above?

 

And while we're at it, I'm still waiting on the response to this one, too. Anyone else who agrees with BiR, feel free to give a response as well.

 

Being pro life does not mean 'I wouldn't kill my baby', it means I do not support or approve of anyone killing a baby. One can not be pro life and believe killing a baby is ok for anyone to do.

 

My response is quite intelligent. There is no game to it. The facts are quite clear. I know plenty of Democrats who truly care about the sanctity of life. That has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

Support for the national Republican Party is a compromise on the issue of abortion. Nothing has been or is going to get done. How many George Bush's are going to tell you they are born again Christians so you will vote for them?

If one chooses to be a Republican apologist, that is his right.

Texas has sent us two Presidents in my lifetime, one from each party, that have greatly damaged this country. Please keep future politicians within your borders.

 

Quote:

Really.

I think I'll let it rest there. You are too filled with hate to be barely more than coherent on the issue.

I'm beginning to think you don't care much about this particular "sanctity of life issue" yourself.

It appears you just need it as an escuse to rant...

so rant on. Any excuse will do. Rants don't have to be coherent.

 

You know, none of these posts have been rants, and sanctity of life has always been my number one concern in any election.

I too will leave it here, as there is no reasoning for anyone who thinks that:
1. Republicans are champions of the sanctity of life
2. George Bush and/or John McCain will lead this country by the Constitution or in a Godly fashion.

Bud, think you need to double check your memory about who says what. I havent even been on this board in 6 months, and I certainly never said anything about not caring about this issue.

Your mindset puts defeating Democrats (an admiral goal) above sanctity of life, just by the fact you believe Republicans will finally change this.

 

How you say something sometimes tells one more than your actual words.

Methinks thou protest too much and much to vehemently to be entirely serious about the subject yourself.

Are you , perhaps, a died in the wool liberal trying to give your arguments legitimacy by claiming to be a conservative? Hmmmm

Time to move on. Your hateful attitude has rendered your arguments entirely moot.

 

You support George W Bush, and you have the gall to call anyone a liberal??? TIme to move on. Your blind support of the Republican party now in place makes a mockery of the sanctity of life.

 

That's exactly why Sarah Palin is NOT pro-life.

 

Your word, AJ, not mine. I don't know you.....

As for whether or not you believe that it is a credible response, that is up to you, AJ. It doesn't invalidate my opinion, nor does it supercede it. My opinion carries as much weight as yours.

I have never understood the complete intolerance that many on the pro-life side have for any opinion that is not in lockstep with theirs. I have said that I am personally pro-life. Politically, I believe that the woman has a right to choose. I also personally believe that homosexuality is wrong, yet politically I believe that a person has a right to decide their own sexuality. Notice that I have not criticized anyone's position on this issue in the discussion, only the manner in which some have decided to address me. Apparently, it is asking too much to expect the same of some among us.

I am not sure why you seemingly cannot understand this, but only a woman can make the choice, and that woman must give account for the choice that is made. Ultimately, it is still her choice, and she has to live with the consequences.