The phrase “believe the KJV is true” is seen to be problematic in a sense, since there is serious division on what the phrase means. On the one side it is shown the phrase is acceptable, if it is at the same time allowed that readings that are clearly different in various passages, readings that give different meanings, are also counted as true. The other side using the phrase “believe the KJV is true” defines the phrase by saying contractions in meaning shown by various versions of teh same verses in different translations are not counted as true. If you agree with the phrase “believe the KJV is true” do you at the same time mean contradictory readings, readings giving different meanings, are also not true? Yes or no?