The Ultimate Con

Hang in there, poncho. Not all God-fearing Christian folk have their head stuck in the sand.

 

Your garbage gets increasingly more foul-smelling the longer it putrifies. You aren't smarter than the average 5th grader, Poncho. Maybe you'd better stay locked in your room. Someone can shove baloney sandwiches through a crack in the door. And don't set your garbage out next to the curb, okay? Keep it in there with you.

 

Are you suggesting that our government planned and executed the 911 attacks?

 

Hundreds of organizations responded to and investigated the WTC attacks. Their conclusion, in all cases, was that Muslim extremists hijacked airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center buildings, resulting in the collapse of both buildings, and severe damage to nearby buildings.

Here are just a few of the organizations that investigated:

The 9/11 Commission
The Congressional Joint Inquiry on 9/11
FBI - the largest and most complex investigation in the history of the FBI.
OSHA - 3.7 million work hours.
Air Traffic Control System Command Center in Washington
American Airlines
American Institute of Steel Construction
Building and Construction Trades Council
Cal Berkeley Engineering Dept.
Central Intelligence Agency
Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat
Counterterrorism and Security Group
Exponent Failure Analysis Associates
Federal Aviation Administration
Fire Department of New York
Georgia Tech Engineering Dept.
100’s of New York City Police Detectives
Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems
Karl Koch Steel Consulting Inc.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
National Science Foundation Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems
National Transportation Safety Board
New York City Department of Design and Construction
New York Port Authority Construction Board
Society of Fire Protection Engineers
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
World Trade Center security staff

And many, many others. What evil genius convinced them all to lie, and to cover up a conspiracy?

 

Even without federal government complicity the question remains as to who planted the explosives in the World Trade Center and how did they manage to do it?

 

What explosives? You have yet to prove that any were used.

Sounds like you want a factual answer to a hypothetical question.

 

The explosives that numerous folks in and around the World Trade Center heard and saw the results of.

 

There were no explosives. Seismologists at Columbia University Observatory stated, "There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosives brought down the towers".

 

As noted before, there has been no proven use of explosives. None.

 

Yeah, maybe the numerous people that reported hearing and seeing explosions in the World Trade Center were just lying through their teeth.

 

Just wait until Popular Mechanics releases the computer animation showing the lie going through their teeth!

 

:laugh: Which channel will that be on?

 

Poncho:

Ah I see you are maintaining your weight by
the frequent exercise: Jumping to Conclusions.

It is the "duty of the U.S. military to protect
and defend the U.S. Constitution from all enemies
foreigh and DOMESTIC". It's duty has NOT
changed. It is the duty of high level Officers
(those with Stars /and Naval Equivalents/) to
provide the civilian leadership with summaries
of capabilities and to get the capabilities that
the civilian leaders request. The reason that the
Generals (and Admirals) are to
provide the civilian leadership with summaries
of capabilities is so the civilian leadership can decide
what to do AS IS THEIR DUTY.
Needless to say, the civilian leadership will
be judged on how good their duty was done.

IMHO nobody should ever know the military/intel options of
capabilities requested by the civilian leadership
or the ones not selected for implimentation by the
civilain leadership. It confuses most people who
can't tell the difference (for example)
between planning a conspiracy and planning a conspiracy
that one can commit. for example, if I get in a conspiracy
to nuke Los Vagas - i have no capability of carrying it
out (PERIOD). I don't even know anybody would
or could do it -- 'would do' is far different from 'could do'.
Both elements HAVE to be present for a conspiracy
to be meaningful. From 1964 to about 1990 the US and
Soviet Union had the capability of destroying all life
(some say only life forms higher than insects) on earth.
But neither one of them had the desire (would) to do so.

Anyway, I agree: the Al'quadi conspiracy to get the USofA's
goat is the ultimate con.

 

Amen Sibling NightShift -- You are so RIGHT ON! :thumbs:

Prime directive of a Conspiracy:

Those who do know do NOT tell;
Those who do tell do not know.

 

Red Chineese TV

Muslim Brotherhood Attacking the Great American Satan

Terrorists' Voice (TV) TV.

etc.

 

Probably just a leap of the imagination on your part. One or more explosions in a building on fire does not necessarily indicate the use of "explosives".

In addition, their untrained ear could hear floors collapsing, beams giving way, cans or drums of various chemical compounds exploding, or any one of a dozen other noises, and consider them explosions.

I repeat again. No one at all has proven that explosives were used. No one. At all.

Prove that and then we can discuss who and why. Until then...

 

No one can prove anything because all the evidence is gone! But maybe I can make you a computer animation.