1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Video That Ended a Career

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Deacon, Apr 15, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Alive in Christ

    Alive in Christ New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,822
    Likes Received:
    1
    This earth and universe are approximately 6,000 to 10,000 years old.

    God spoke the universe, and all that exists, into existence. We KNOW that to be so by way of Gods written revelation to us.

    Evolution is a COMPLETE...100%...ridiculous...(((FAIRY TALE.))), Peggy!

    Right up there with Puff the magic dragon and the tooth fairy.

    It is held to by its believers by absolutely NOTHING other than faith. Wishfull thinking.

    Fish turning into rabbits. Rabbits turning into horses. Horses turing into chimps. Chimps turning into humans. :laugh:

    Pure absurdity

    People will fall for anything.
     
  2. HAMel

    HAMel Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    96
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I personally don't have a problem whether our world is 6 - 10,000 years old, or 160 million years old.

    To me, this is one of those areas that we can only speculate about. If the universe was created a million years ago and the world we know is according to Scripture, then so be it!

    I tend to believe the Word of our Lord and accept it at that. One day I'm sure we'll find out for sure but until then...,

    I think these folks who emphatically declare the world is 90 billion years old are merely attempting to discount the Word of God. What a waste.
     
  3. Peggy

    Peggy New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    0
    First of all, how sad that people judge one's faith or salvation on whether or not one believes in a literal creation or not. You don't even know me... how can you judge whether I am saved or not. For shame. At the Last Judgement, is Jesus going to have a pop quiz on theology or whether or not you believe in a literal Creation account? (Matt. 25: 31-46)

    The sciences, particularly astronomy and geology, say that the earth is millions of years old. This can be proven. When you say the earth is only 6000-10000 you cannot prove it. It is merely an interpretation of the Creation story. The Creation story is not meant to be taken literally... it was how God explained the beginnings of the world to primitive cultures.

    Yes... millions if not billions of years ago.


    No, the Creation account is a "fairy tale".

    The Creation myth is held to by its believers by absolutely NOTHING other than faith. Wishfull thinking.
    That is not evolution. God created and molded creatures "after their kind". But what we call "Horse" did not magically appear overnight, neither did the mountains or the stars. The mountains were formed over eons; the stars burst into existence by God's command billions of years ago. We are only just now seeing the light from the farthest stars. And life forms as we know them did not appear overnight, but were formed gradually by God's creative hand. The fossil records confirm that.


    That's your unscientific opinion :)


    I agree.

    I grew up in a Fundamentalist church that taught a literal, six-day creation. I now feel cheated out of not learning the truth. I feel cheated because I did not learn about geology or astronomy as sciences, but was given nonsensical interpretations that did not conform to the reality that I saw with my own eyes. I feel cheated because I would have enjoyed studying geology and especially astronomy, but was steered away from that by my Fundamentalist teachers. When they said that God created the earth with "an appearance of age", I thought, "why would God want to fool us?" So I have complete respect for this professor who does not wish to propagate a literal six-day Creation story that completely contradicts reason. Reason and true science will not contradict faith. My faith in God is even more firm when I think of His creative hand and presence forming the universe over such a vast amount of time that I cannot even comprehend it. We believe that God is eternal, with no beginning and end. Surely the thought that He created the universe billions of years ago does not contradict this statement, but enhances it. What a God, who had us in mind when He created the world billions of years ago! It boggles the mind.
     
    #23 Peggy, Apr 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2010
  4. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    So I guess the 10 commandments weren't meant to be taken literally?
    Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

    That's as clear as God can make it.






    What?????? God doesn't write fairy tales. I can't believe I just read this!


    Again, I can't believe I just read this. This is what my atheist family members say. Not saying you're an atheist. Maybe just a very confused and deceived Christian?




    You're right. Nothing appeared "magically". God created all things and spoke them into existence just the way He purposed to and just the way scripture plainly tells.

    Colossians 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:




    :laugh:
    No. That's yours.




    HERE is a very interesting presentation that would be well worth your time.
     
  5. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    There is only one exception to your post. Most Baptist preachers turn their mid section into frog bellies after several years of raiding pot lucks.
     
  6. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    HA!!!! :laugh:
     
  7. Alive in Christ

    Alive in Christ New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,822
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yep. :laugh:

    And even though I am not a pastor, I was evolving into a frog belly a while back.

    But I came to my senses and have de-evolved back to my good and slim 190 pound self! :wavey:
     
  8. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    I never judged your salvation. I just said you didn't have faith. If you don't believe God's word, then you don't have faith in it or what He said.


    By this line of reasoning, the sciences say that someone can't be dead for three days and then be brought back to life. Will you now tell me that the resurrection is not meant to be taken literally? Science will also tell us that it's impossible for someone to walk on water. Will you now tell me that Jesus walking on water was a myth?


    Pitiful....

    Yes, once again I have faith, you don't. You've just illustrated my earlier point.

    Wait a second now! The sciences will tell us that it is impossible that their exists a God to command the stars into existence. By your earlier line of reasoning you must also believe that God is a myth.
     
  9. uhdum

    uhdum New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is fascinating; we don't have any evolutionary creationists (that I know of) down here in ol' western Kentucky... I have to read about 'em on the world wide interwebs!

    Although I believe in a literal 6-day creation like I believe His word says, Peggy, what is one thing that led you to this particular belief?
     
  10. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    Peggy said, "God created and molded creatures "after their kind". But what we call "Horse" did not magically appear overnight, neither did the mountains or the stars. The mountains were formed over eons; the stars burst into existence by God's command billions of years ago. We are only just now seeing the light from the farthest stars. And life forms as we know them did not appear overnight, but were formed gradually by God's creative hand. The fossil records confirm that."

    Question: How do the fossil records, which apparently is your source of truth, confirm that "God created..."?
     
  11. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me get this straight...you're a staunch defender of the Shroud of Turin...but you call the creation account a "myth," a "fairy tale," and question the intelligence of those who believe it?

    You seem pretty mixed-up to me.
     
  12. Benjamin

    Benjamin Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    8,423
    Likes Received:
    1,160
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I would presume that Peggy is speaking of a “a literal six day creation/ Young Earth creation interpretation” and this is what she is referring to as “myth” and “fairy tale” and not “creation” in general. Possibly the mix up is that she left out this clarification and is falling prey here to semantics? Just a guess…
     
  13. uhdum

    uhdum New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    We can only hope... :)
     
  14. Peggy

    Peggy New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe I was clear in saying that I believe that the Creation story was written down to explain to primitive cultures the hand of God in creation. It is not, nor was it meant to be, a scientific explanation of the beginnings of the universe. Did God create the universe? Yes. Did He do it in six literal days? No. Did I say that I question the intelligence of those who believe in a literal six day creation? No.

    I'm not sure if anyone actually read my post. You question my faith because I don't believe in a literal six day creation, yet I said that belief in a universe that God spoke into existence and took billions of years to emerge strengthens my belief in Him.

    I believe The Shroud of Turin is genuine... although I don't want to go down that rabbit trail and get off subject.
     
    #34 Peggy, Apr 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2010
  15. Benjamin

    Benjamin Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    8,423
    Likes Received:
    1,160
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just to be clear after reading the above post, since you quoted me, and then went on to say, "You question my faith"...FTR, I did no such thing, I simply pointed out that some clarification might be needed, on/for your behalf.
     
  16. Michaelt

    Michaelt Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Curious question ma'am? How are the six days interpreted then in Genesis, and again in Exodus? Aren't all the other uses of the word translated for day used in the same way through scripture, especially when given a numerical along with it?

    And a second curious query? Is there anything that you read in scripture that could provide a basis for a non literal six day creation?

    I don't want to jump on the bashing bandwagon so I won't, but those two questions came to mind so I thought I'd ask?
     
  17. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,489
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Dr. Bruce Waltke’s Statement of Clarification:

    “I had not seen the video before it was distributed. Having seen it, I realize its deficiency and wish to put my comments in a fuller theological context:

    1. Adam and Eve are historical figures from whom all humans are descended; they are uniquely created in the image of God and as such are not in continuum with animals.

    2. Adam is the federal and historical head of the fallen human race just as Jesus Christ is the federal and historical head of the Church.

    3. I am not a scientist, but I have familiarized myself with attempts to harmonize Genesis 1-3 with science, and I believe that creation by the process of evolution is a tenable Biblical position, and, as represented by BioLogos, the best Christian apologetic to defend Genesis 1-3 against its critics.

    4. I apologize for giving the impression that others who seek to harmonize the two differently are not credible. I honor all who contend for the Christian faith.

    5. Evolution as a process must be clearly distinguished from evolutionism as a philosophy. The latter is incompatible with orthodox Christian theology.

    6. Science is fallible and subject to revision. As a human and social enterprise, science will always be in flux. My first commitment is to the infallibility (as to its authority) and inerrancy (as to its Source) of Scripture.

    7. God could have created the Garden of Eden with apparent age or miraculously, even as Christ instantly turned water into wine, but the statement that God “caused the trees to grow” argues against these notions.


    8. I believe that the Triune God is Maker and Sustainer of heaven and earth and that biblical Adam is the historical head of the human race.


    9. Theological comments made here are mostly a digest of my chapters on Genesis 1-3 in An Old Testament Theology (Zondervan, 2007).”
     
  18. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,489
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Most of these points have been exhaustively disputed ad nauseam on a multitude of websites (including this one) If you're really curious do a search of this site.

    Simple Observations Regarding the Word “day” in Genesis 1-2:

    1) A problem that was noticed thousands of years ago concerns how long a day might be or how there might be an “evening and morning” before the sun was made on day four.

    2) If we are to translate “dayconsistently literal mean a “24-hour day” then there’s a problem with Genesis 2:17 (“but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” Genesis 2:17 ESV).

    3) Day six seems to have more activities than could be accomplished in a normal 24-hour day.

    4) Genesis 2:4 shows yet another reason the word “day” can mean something other than 24 hours.

    Additionally there is New Testament support for the broader interpretation of the Genesis day based upon the text of Hebrews 4: 1-13.

    Rob
     
  19. Michaelt

    Michaelt Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Good points, but in the context, and there are some 400+ instances where the word day is used in conjunction with a number to specify "a day", as in a 24 hour period.

    Granted it's understandable if you use the term without a number with it, then it can be any period of time.

    I wouldn't see any problem with Gen 2:4, the "day" usage there enveloping the time frame of the six days of creation that were described earlier in Genesis? So I agree it "can" mean something other than a 24 hour day, and I would say that in many instances it "does"; but I think calling the first day, second day, third day, etc....I think that gives a little more narrow scope of what the context of the word was.

    Day six seems to have more activities than could be accomplished in a normal 24 hour day? We are still talking about God here yes? The creator of all things? Certainly God could do any number of activities in one 24 hour day, could He not? I mean, He could have created the entire galaxy and all life in an instant if He chose, could He not?
     
    #39 Michaelt, Apr 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2010
  20. Timsings

    Timsings Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2006
    Messages:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Faith:
    Baptist

    This is the most true statement that you have made. However, it cuts both ways.

    Tim Reynolds
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...