They Call Me Liberal ........

Hence Crabby's ability to vote, support and fawn over pro-abortion politicans.

 

"Keep culture and Christ seperate."

And he wonders why his salvation is viewed as dubious, at best.

 

Pound sand, coward, until you answer my questions to you, in your disgusting I hate Romney" thread. Until you answer those, I will only talk ABOUT you, and the leaven with which you have been allowed to weaken this ministry.

For the Moderators, remember, C.T.Boy said republicans worship money. For some reason, he feels justified in saying an entire group could not be saved.

Until he acts like a man.....

 

Or it could be a result of knowledge that the Christianity you present on this board is not the Christianity of scripture. Most likely a result of ignorance and left wing indoctrination that leads to hypocritical support of candidates that support the murder of unborn children. Using excuses such as "well I can't do anything about it and they support my other pet far left wing issues so I will overlook the deaths of so many babies my candidates are willing to support. Not only do you support candidates that support abortion but you support organizations that do the killing. Such is not part of Christianity and there is a deep and dark place in hell for people who murder babies.

There is no good excuse for that and it certainly does not support people nor is it part of the Kingdom of God. shame on you and your false brand of Christianity.

 

He can't even call an unborn child alive. Where is Christ in C.T.Boy's posts ?

 

No, you use man made terms that allow for the dehumanizing of unborn children so they can be murdered in the womb.

 

Also, you see Tom Butler has asked excellent questions, and pointed out some inconsistencies, that C.T.Boy seems to be pretending aren't there.

Also, he seems to be whining about being called a liberal, but if you believe what the New Testament says about women preachers, he has NO PROBLEM calling you a bigot.

His self pity thread here is a joke.

 

Show me one single post where I ever called you a liberal. In fact I have never called anyone that label.

And what about people in the womb?

 

It is obvious that this thread was not started to have reasonable debate. It was started to create conflict and mock people. apparently his view of Christianity is very immature.

 

How exactly does one do this when the "political position" is the murder of the unborn?

 

He never debates. He name-calls, flames, and judges. Then goes running to the moderators.

 

And he's been banned from here, twice.

 

Show me where I called you liberal.

 

The OP was obviously meant to mock anyone who does not agree with your particular brand of liberalism...

"...hurricanes are caused by high-pressure systems and not by gay marriages"

If this is not mockery - please name one person who has ever even remotely said of even hinted that hurricanes are caused by gay marriages.

 

I see he's denying he's called people names.

There isn't a truthful, honest bone in his entire self-pitying body.

 

The bottom line to this whole mess is the two people we as a nation chose to run against for the office of President. If the situation was opposite than now (an extreme liberal running against a moderate liberal), say, a conservative was actually nominated by the Republicans and the Democrats nominated a moderate, there would be no arguing amongst most of us who believe in conservative principles. All of the bickering would be to the left.

Sometimes in the debate between those voting for Romney and those who are not because of his religion or past record, we forget how politically close we are. This is a very difficult situation for conservatives this year, and really, there is no need for condemnation however someone decides to cast their vote. One person feels that they are not going to vote for someone like Romney based on principle under any circumstance, and the next believes that a vote for Romney is the only way to rid this nation of Obama. That is why we have the principle of one vote per person, so that we make a collective decision.

Had everyone done what they should have beginning in 2008, and worked for a conservative nominee, we could have avoided all of this, but we did not, so we deal the best way we know how with the people chosen. The only thing one can do is try to make 2016 a better outcome. But guess what, once the election if over, 99% of the people will not give it a second thought until the powers that be are entrenched for the next election cycle, and the same old arguing will start all over again, once again, not learning one thing.