To KJVOs, Does The Translator notes matter

So? And what are they watching, "hell-a-vision"?:smilewinkgrin:

 

The KJVO position is a "doctrine of man," Sal. You bow to it...

Yes, the KJVO position is a great example of this.

Say what? You're not making sense here, Sal...

 

have you been peeking again?:tongue3:

Gross misunderstanding on your behalf, again. We stand on complete harmony while your type is still guessing.

Here, Keith, I'll get the cookies down for you:laugh:

If making the accusation against the KJB by the translators being "pedo-baptist/ Anglicans", why is that such a "haneous crime" when God used Saul of Tarsus/ Apostle paul/ murderer of Christians, to pen down most of the New testament?:sleep:

 

Is your comparison valid? How does the conduct of Saul before his salvation relate to the the doctrinal views of Church of England translators during the time of their translating? According to a number of the actual Church of England doctrinal views held by the KJV translators during the time of their translating, they misunderstood and misinterpreted some of the Scriptures.

Futhermore, you seem to ignore the fact that Paul's penning down of several books of the New Testament were under the miracle of direct inspiration of God.

The Church of England translators in 1611 did not operate under direct inspiration of God.

By the way, some of the KJV translators were involved in having men burned at the stake for their faith and in the persecution of others for their faith.