Unbelieveable

Don · Jul 9, 2013

Ya know, there was a poster here some months ago called FreeAtLast, who was banned because of the way he acted, especially towards military...but then stories like this pop up, and one has to wonder just how close to being right he might actually be....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ith-rare-use-third-amendment/?test=latestnews

A Nevada family is using a rare legal argument in a lawsuit claiming police tried to commandeer their homes for a surveillance operation and then arrested the homeowners for resisting -- invoking the Third Amendment, which bars soldiers from being "quartered" in a residence without permission.

The Mitchell family, in a lawsuit filed July 1, detailed the incident from July 10, 2011. According to the complaint, it all began when the Henderson city police called Anthony Mitchell that morning to say they needed his house to gain “tactical advantage” in a domestic violence investigation in the neighborhood.
The situation turned ugly when Mitchell refused repeated requests to leave and police smashed through the door, the 18-page complaint states.

Mitchell alleges the police, upon entering his home, forced him to the floor at gunpoint, then shot him and his “cowering” dog with a few rounds of pepper-spray pellets. Police then allegedly handcuffed and arrested Mitchell in connection with “obstructing a police officer” before occupying his home.
Click to expand...

Bro. Curtis · Jul 9, 2013

Fits right in with the "find them guilty, even if you have to lie" crowd.

A proud day for statists.

Unbelieveable

Don Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter

Useful Searches

Unbelieveable

Don Well-Known Member Site Supporter

Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif> Site Supporter

Don Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter