Union Violates First Amendment Rights

Discussion in 'Politics' started by carpro, Dec 7, 2006.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110009352

    State of the Unions
    Should you pay for someone else's opinions? A teachers union think so.

    BY STEPHEN MOORE
    Thursday, December 7, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

    EXCERPT

    SPOKANE, Wash.--Teachers unions are supposed to promote the financial interests of, well, teachers--but not in Washington state. Here, the Washington Education Association is fighting some 4,000 nonmember teachers who don't want their paychecks raided each year and used for political activities that they don't believe in. "The right of free speech is being trampled" by the union political spending, complains Scott Carlson, a business teacher in Spokane. "And that's a right I hold very precious."

    Too bad the unions don't. The WEA derisively refers to teachers like Mr. Carlson who want their money back not as free-speech advocates but "dissidents." The goal is to squash these dissidents by overturning Initiative 134, a law--approved by 72% of Washington voters in 1992--that requires unions to obtain written approval from teachers before dues are spent on campaigns or candidates. Back in March, the unions got a surprising assist from the state Supreme Court, which ruled that the paycheck protection law places "too heavy" a burden on the free-speech rights of the union.

    The case has now been bumped up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear oral arguments in January--in what could be the most important First Amendment decision in years.
     
  2. bobbyd

    bobbyd
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    And what else does the teacher's unions believe? Not anything i want my money to support, i know that much!
     
  3. El_Guero

    El_Guero
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is a shame that liberals belive it is ok to support a liberal agenda but not a conservative agenda.

    Why don't we start a national teachers union and garnish wages to support you and me for president and vice president of our conservative retirement program . . .

    :laugh:

     
  4. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    I believe the coming decision from SCOTUS will not please union leaders.:thumbs:
     
  5. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    I guess you think it is good to do away with unions, right?
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294

    To forcefully take ones money and use it in a way they object to should be unconstitutional. To take a non members money, at all, is criminal. IMHO

    Do you believe they should have the right to take your money when you are not a member?

    BTW
    Terry , do you ever contribute anything meaningful to any of these discussions?:(
     
  7. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    So it's a yes, you are against unions?
     
  8. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm with you Bro. Unions began by representing people. Now they are a business the represent themselves. I'm not saying unions should be disbanded but tell me what the problem is with having a vote so the unions monitary donations and agenda is that of the majority of it's members? The only union leader who would fear or object to that would be one with his own agenda.

    It's like having a president leading your country that didn't get the majority vote...
     
  9. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3
    Many companies do this to. My former employer made it well known that you were expected to contribute to their PAC fund.
     
  10. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    No kidding? What happened if you didn't?
     
  11. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218
    GW DID recieve a majority of the votes

    As my father used to say, "Their motto is 'I have made up my mind, Dont confuse me with the facts' "
     
  12. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3

    You're both half right (and half wrong).

    2000 Election
    George W. Bush Richard Cheney Republican 50,460,110 47.87%
    Albert Gore Jr. Joseph Lieberman Democratic 51,003,926 48.27%


    2004 Election
    George W. Bush Richard Cheney Republican 62,040,610 50.73%
    John Kerry John Edwards Democratic 59,028,439 48.27%
     
  13. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm over it man, I vote with a magnum now. No chads or dimples when I'm done! :BangHead:
     
  14. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by StraightAndNarrow
    Many companies do this to. My former employer made it well known that you were expected to contribute to their PAC fund.






    Same question.:confused:
     
  15. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3
    I think all PAC's should be abolished. Unfortunately, the Republican majority for the last six years didn't agree. Hopefully, the Democrats can do a better job.
     
  16. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    What happened if you didn't?
     
  17. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3
    You wouldn't get fired but might not get as good a performance review. Of course nobody ever said that it was because you didn't contribute to the PAC.
     
  18. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Sounds like coercion to me.

    It should be illegal.
     
  19. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree, but rue the fact that a State Supreme Court would rule against an individual's rights to free speach, and for a Union. I guess San Francisco and Miami/Dade don't have the exclusive corner on unconstitutional findings.
     
  20. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wine or cartridge?
     

Share This Page

Loading...