Untold story on 9-11

Why would ANYONE need to fire a missile into a building if you can crash an airliner full of fuel into the building?

Just specifically what kind of missile do you propose would cause more damage than an airliner loaded for continental crossing?

 

Department of Physics and Astronomy Brigham Young University

 

Untold? Seems to me I've heard it before...a few times.

 

And every time it has been told it has been totally shown to be bunk. Anyone who supports nutty theories like this has absolutely no credibility.

 

With every other major air line crash the wreckage is recovered, moved to a hanger, and the damage analyzed. The crash and subsequent fire at the Pentegon was not sufficient to melt the plane into nothingness. Why have we not seen photos of the assembled wreckage?

 

If there is an ongoing investigation, ESPECIALLY with the pentagon involved, I would assume that it is rightfully "classified".

 

And refuted just as many times. The OP is a complete waste of time.

 

I want somebody to tell me just exactly what type of missile is in the military arsenal that could be fired from the top of a building and do the damage of a fully fueled airliner. . .

Besides, did you NOT see the film of the airliner crashing into the building? Why on earth would a small missile be fired at the building also?

 

</font>[/QUOTE]Laugh all you want Phillip, that won't stop more and more people from questioning the 'official story'. Quite a few people in the US, UK governments and others are saying 9/11 looks to be an inside job and more people are coming out everyday. Your opinions are very quickly finding their way into the minority.

 

Baloney. Most people know who did it.

Perhaps instead of hurling paranoid delusions, you could answer some of the intelligent questions you are being asked.....

 

There were so many theories and things flying around that morning about what was happening! No one knew what was going on for quite some time. I remember here in Milwaukee the first thing I heard was that we were being bombed! I thought the guy meant Milwaukee was under attack!

None of us knew which way to look, except up.

 

On the contrary. People question it all the time, review it, and end up refuting such cospiracy theorist nonsense.

 

Such as? Bro Curtis.

I reckon one could get that impression from the controlled press Johnv.

 

Or from the abundance of video footage, both professional and amateur. Not a single video taken that day supports your contention.

&lt;personal attack deleted - LE&gt;

It's truly amazing that you have no idea that, the more you post, the more your posts resemble sheer lunacy. What news agency, having found proof that a missile was involved, would not jump at the chance to scoop that story?

[ November 14, 2005, 06:49 PM: Message edited by: LadyEagle ]

 

This statement isn't tecnically correct in light of all the evidence we haven't seen yet is it.?

Let us see it all. If they aren't hiding anything they got nothing to fear.

I've noticed that you typically attack the poster and not the issue. Shame on you.

Uh, one that is controlled by a globalist conglomerate? 6 multi national corporations own the greater share of the media. So much for diversification.

[ November 14, 2005, 06:50 PM: Message edited by: LadyEagle ]

 

I'm not about to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon just yet. But things do smell fishy. There is something that is untold- and it will catch the worlds eye soon.

 

Posted by Johnv

Or from the abundance of video footage, both professional and amateur. Not a single video taken that day supports your contention.

&lt;quoted personal attack deleted - LE&gt;

It's truly amazing that you have no idea that, the more you post, the more your posts resemble sheer lunacy. What news agency, having found proof that a missile was involved, would not jump at the chance to scoop that story?


Thank you, Johnv.

[ November 14, 2005, 06:51 PM: Message edited by: LadyEagle ]

 

poncho posts...
I've noticed that you typically attack the poster and not the issue. Shame on you.

&lt;personal attack deleted - LE&gt;

[ November 14, 2005, 06:52 PM: Message edited by: LadyEagle ]