1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Warren & PDC In The News

Discussion in '2006 Archive' started by Don, Sep 6, 2006.

  1. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    And you still could be a fundamentalist even if you liked RW.
    Why is it that so many fundamentalists have strayed from the true fundamentals and have included ridiculous qualifications to being a fundamentalist.... Like being a KJVO, slobbering, jumping, foaming at the mouth type. It is time we get back to showing love to people the way Christ did... But it seems that that word, "love" is a dirty word to a lot of people.
     
  2. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    True. You can be a fundamentalist and still like Rick Warren. However, as a fundamentalist, it doesn't sound as though Mr. Warren is going to like you.

    "Warren predicts that fundamentalism, of all varieties, will be 'one of the big enemies of the 21st century.' 'Muslim fundamentalism, Christian fundamentalism, Jewish fundamentalism, secular fundamentalism - they're all motivated by fear. Fear of each other."
    (Source: http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/living/religion/13573441.htm)​

    And if you're a fundamentalist then Rick considers you to have a "legalistic, narrow view of Christianity."


    "Today there really aren't that many Fundamentalists left; I don't know if you know that or not, but they are such a minority; there aren't that many Fundamentalists left in America ... Now the word 'fundamentalist' actually comes from a document in the 1920s called the Five Fundamentals of the Faith. And it is a very legalistic, narrow view of Christianity." Quote by Rick Warren, May 2005
    (Source: http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/rwfundamentalism.htm)

    If you're a fundamentalist it seems so odd that you would be so allied with someone who is so opposed to your views.

    You must know some crazy fundamentalists. I've never met any that hold to these criteria.
     
  3. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I invite you to visit central WV... You will find all kinds of crazy! :smilewinkgrin:

    Come to think of it, that is where I was raised....hmmm... that can explain a lot.
    :wavey: :praying:
    Seriously, because of this type of craziness is why I refuse to call my self a fundamentalist. I still believe in the original fundamentals that the term "fundamentalist" derived from... I believe them so much I would die for them, but because of the craziness, and adding unbiblical standards to the term "fundamentalist" I don't want to be called one. Now I wouldn't mind being called an Old Fashioned Fundamentalist, (OFF for short! :laugh: )

    Maybe this is what Warren meant.
    BTW, I don't agree with Warren either on every point, but having gone through the 40 days of purpose, I gained more insight to what he believed.

    Just a couple months ago, I was going through some old SBC discipleship training material from the 70s... Guess what I found.

    Lessons that taught that the purpose of the church was Worship, Evangelism, Fellowship, Ministry, and Discipleship. Musta been what RW used to come up with his views.
     
  4. meandmykjv

    meandmykjv New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree I am sure there were many who did not lead anyone to Christ, especially with the persecution you see some endured, the role of woman back then, technology being different, woman out on a farm for example, some lived very seclusive lives I would think. I guess when some woman would meet at the well, they could share Christ with the others there. But, also, who says just because you share you lead someone to Christ , to begin with?
     
  5. bound

    bound New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are aware that 'repetitive breath prayers' such as Hesychism out-date the New Age Movement by 1000's of years. Prayers like the "Jesus Prayer" have 'nothing-to-do' with the New Age Movement.

    I don't know much about Rick Warren but I do know a small amount about Christian Culture and Tradition throughout the world and you are revealing your ignorance of it with you association of such things with New Age.
     
  6. MatthewDiscipleOfGod

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Matthew 6:7 And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.
     
  7. bound

    bound New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which greek word in this verse is 'vain repetition' used to translate? Would you also hold that we should 'only' pray in Closets? Are 'all' who pray in the streets hypocrites? I believe using this to rule out earlier prayer traditions is very questionable.
     
  8. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jesus doesn't condemn repetitions. He condemns "vain" repetitions.

    This condemnation can't be split into two parts.
     
  9. bound

    bound New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly! I don't know how many times I heard my grandmother walking around the house saying "Thank you Jesus". Over and over throughout the day and night for different things and to think that some would believe this kind of 'awareness of the divine' is comdemned is just crazy.
     
Loading...