Was a longer ending added by a zealous scribe?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by Boanerges, Mar 5, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Boanerges

    Boanerges
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did a zealous scribe add the longer ending on Mark 16:9-20 in some manuscripts? What is your opinion?
     
  2. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    11,401
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    No. The authenticity of the longer ending have been proven beyond any doubt. Read Burgon's "The Last Twelve Verses of Mark." Even Hort admitted he "Could not answer the good Dean" on that issue.
     
  3. mioque

    mioque
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. Boanerges

    Boanerges
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    0
    sssssh..... You didn't give anyone else a chance. [​IMG] you myth buster you! [​IMG]
     
  5. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doc Cass is certainly no myth buster just because some here accept whatever the 'good' Doctor says. I do feel it was added later. S,B,304,2386, most Lectionaries, Syriac, 1 Coptic (south). But I will say this Mark 16:9-20 was added very early. You would have to be stupid to not copy 12 verses. And those verses contain a good deal of alternate readings even within the text. Always a sign that the text was probably added.
     
  6. Boanerges

    Boanerges
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know why I like the "good" doctor. Because he supplies manuscript numbers to support his assertions.
     
  7. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes but many times these numbers and figures he quotes are misleading see your other thread 'Differences between the TR and the Alexandrian' for a good example of his misrepresenting the facts.
     
  8. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    11,401
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    Or not copy them for a reason while leaving a blank space exactly the size those 12 verses would take up in the column.

    I would advise you not to try to give a book report on a book you have not yet read.
     
  9. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Or not copy them for a reason while leaving a blank space exactly the size those 12 verses would take up in the column.

    I would advise you not to try to give a book report on a book you have not yet read.
    </font>[/QUOTE]Why would the scribe delete thos 12 verses? Do you have a guess or a reason? It just doesn't make sense. They left the other 3 accounts of the Resurrection of Christ in why would they choose to delete that one? Maybe you know something I don't. But it just doesn't make sense to me.
     
  10. Bluefalcon

    Bluefalcon
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    913
    Likes Received:
    4
    Only 3 Greek NT MSS in the world don't contain the last 12 verses of Mark, and the mother of those MSS could just as easily have omitted it because the ending, as was so frequently the case, was the last page in the exemplar, and was destroyed. If the integrity of our New Testament depends on just 3 Greek MSS, one of which was copied some 1400 years after the birth of Christ, then we're in big trouble!
     
  11. standingfirminChrist

    standingfirminChrist
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    0
    was a shorter version written by a jealous scribe?
     
  12. Phillip

    Phillip
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    One of the reasons people do not believe the longer version is they think it is relevant to them. They are obviously taking scripture that wasn't meant for them when it was originally written...so, therefore, I have no problem with the longer version. Unlike some pastors I know who will not read it from the pulpit. Sad......
     
  13. Eliyahu

    Eliyahu
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    My understanding was that there are 620 MSS for Mark, and among them 617 has the longer ending, 1 doesn't have the entire chapter of 16, only 2 (B, and Aleph) have shorter ending.

    Even A and C have the longer ending.

    Can anyone verify this point?
     
  14. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Textual Variants page
     
  15. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    11,401
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    One last time. Read the book!
     
  16. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    I missed the part where DeclareHim attempted to give a book report.

    May I be advised of that passage?
     
  17. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    What book??
     
  18. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    11,401
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    What book?? </font>[/QUOTE]&lt;sigh&gt; The book mentioned in the 2nd post in this thread!
     
  19. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok I'll read the book. It's not in print anymore but it seems to be readily available.
     
  20. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Declarehim,
    Forget not to bow thyself before the throne.

    Silly rabbitt
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...