Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Forever settled in heaven, Feb 21, 2004.
he's the 8009th member!
woohoo, can't wait for that first post.
Dr Ruckman KJB1611 will post on this BB at any time. Will, A-A, Homebound and others including myself will watch Ruckman's first post here soon.
Could be interesting, but I severely doubt it's the real Ruckman. Besides, I don't think the real Ruckman could honestly agree to the BaptistBoard rules.
I have a feeling that Dr R is a reincarnation .
Possibly wrong of course, but we will see.
Don't hold your breath for that first post. That was at least the 10th reincarnation! He's already outta here!
Phony as the KJVO myth.
As do I..
Dr.Ruckman has no use for computers;said he would NOT even look @ one twice...
Strikingly similar to his use for the truth ...
Thank you, Sister Diane.
I heard once that the Antichrist would
happen on a 13th reincarnation!
You're welcome Ed.
I don't agree with Ruckman on many things, but isn't it against sound Biblical teaching to speak evil of the dead?
Thanks for allowing the world to identify yall.
What!?! I didn't know he was dead! When did this happen?
When sorcerers and speak of re-incarnation they're speaking of the dead. Like I've said several times, I know very little about Peter Ruckman, and I will not take part in the gossip about a Brother in Christ. The hatred is being espoused and rather greatly in this thread on top of that.
This is NOT Ruckman but a previous member who has been banned and come back 9-10 times now. The remarks are about a person who pretends to be well known people or a preacher in an effort to cause strife!
Then why play along? Seems to me yall are part of the same game. It's the simple mention of Peter Ruckman that gets yall all worked up and suspicious at the same time. Maybe your suspicion is true, but the defamtion of Peter Ruckman is malicious at best. That is all I've said. If the problem is with the person as an imposter, then take it to the PM is what the rules tell me, but I've been wrong before, at least when other members have twisted the rules and acted in total and blatant disregard to said rules, whatever.
Amen and amen, BroRicky!
Does anyone else find it ironic that Precepts is concerned about defamation after all of his attacks on people in this forum???
What's ironic is how different we see things.
But not nearly as ironic as seeing someone who has made a BB career out of baseless attacks on those who love God's word complain about comments concerning the name of a public figure who has put his information in published materials, while that name is being used by someone who lied about it to try to gain access to the board.
Because it's fun.
Maybe your suspicion is true, but the defamtion of Peter Ruckman is malicious at best.
How about Balaam. Since he's dead, should we now speak only well of him ? He was a preacher.
but I've been wrong before
Amen. Me too.