Welcome to our newest member: Dr Ruckman KJB1611

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Forever settled in heaven, Feb 21, 2004.

  1. Forever settled in heaven

    Forever settled in heaven
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    he's the 8009th member!

    woohoo, can't wait for that first post. [​IMG]
     
  2. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr Ruckman KJB1611 will post on this BB at any time. Will, A-A, Homebound and others including myself will watch Ruckman's first post here soon. [​IMG]
     
  3. BrianT

    BrianT
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
    Could be interesting, but I severely doubt it's the real Ruckman. Besides, I don't think the real Ruckman could honestly agree to the BaptistBoard rules. [​IMG]
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    I have a feeling that Dr R is a reincarnation .

    Possibly wrong of course, but we will see.
     
  5. dianetavegia

    dianetavegia
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Don't hold your breath for that first post. That was at least the 10th reincarnation! He's already outta here!

    Diane
     
  6. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Phony as the KJVO myth.
     
  7. Anti-Alexandrian

    Anti-Alexandrian
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    As do I..

    Dr.Ruckman has no use for computers;said he would NOT even look @ one twice...
     
  8. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Strikingly similar to his use for the truth ...
     
  9. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you, Sister Diane. [​IMG]

    I heard once that the Antichrist would
    happen on a 13th reincarnation! :eek:
     
  10. dianetavegia

    dianetavegia
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    You're welcome Ed.

    Diane
     
  11. Precepts

    Precepts
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't agree with Ruckman on many things, but isn't it against sound Biblical teaching to speak evil of the dead?

    Thanks for allowing the world to identify yall.
     
  12. Orvie

    Orvie
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    What!?! I didn't know he was dead! When did this happen?
     
  13. Precepts

    Precepts
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    When sorcerers and speak of re-incarnation they're speaking of the dead. Like I've said several times, I know very little about Peter Ruckman, and I will not take part in the gossip about a Brother in Christ. The hatred is being espoused and rather greatly in this thread on top of that.
     
  14. dianetavegia

    dianetavegia
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    This is NOT Ruckman but a previous member who has been banned and come back 9-10 times now. The remarks are about a person who pretends to be well known people or a preacher in an effort to cause strife!

    Diane
     
  15. Precepts

    Precepts
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Then why play along? Seems to me yall are part of the same game. It's the simple mention of Peter Ruckman that gets yall all worked up and suspicious at the same time. Maybe your suspicion is true, but the defamtion of Peter Ruckman is malicious at best. That is all I've said. If the problem is with the person as an imposter, then take it to the PM is what the rules tell me, but I've been wrong before, at least when other members have twisted the rules and acted in total and blatant disregard to said rules, whatever. :rolleyes:
     
  16. GrannyGumbo

    GrannyGumbo
    Expand Collapse
    <img src ="/Granny.gif">

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen and amen, BroRicky!
     
  17. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone else find it ironic that Precepts is concerned about defamation after all of his attacks on people in this forum??? [​IMG] :rolleyes:
     
  18. GrannyGumbo

    GrannyGumbo
    Expand Collapse
    <img src ="/Granny.gif">

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's ironic is how different we see things.
     
  19. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    But not nearly as ironic as seeing someone who has made a BB career out of baseless attacks on those who love God's word complain about comments concerning the name of a public figure who has put his information in published materials, while that name is being used by someone who lied about it to try to gain access to the board.
     
  20. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,258
    Likes Received:
    4
    Because it's fun.

    Maybe your suspicion is true, but the defamtion of Peter Ruckman is malicious at best.

    How about Balaam. Since he's dead, should we now speak only well of him ? He was a preacher.

    but I've been wrong before

    Amen. Me too.
     

Share This Page

Loading...