1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What Constitutes a Work?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 6, 2007.

Top Posters
Page 6 of 8
  1. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: Am I only limited to the two choices you give?

    First repentance is antecedent to salvation, not a consequent of. Just the same, one can only say we are saved because we repent ‘in a sense.’ Repentance is NOT the grounds of salvation. We are saved for the sake of the mercy of God. That is the only grounds of salvation I know of. Repentance is a condition of salvation. Grounds and conditions are not synonymous. Let me illustrate.


    A man goes to prison for life, being justly condemned and sentenced by a judge for a specific crime. Can such an individual ‘merit’ a pardon by the performance of good works while in prison? Can such a criminal perform good works to such a degree that the governor is forced to grant this man a pardon based merely on the ‘merit’ of the performance of such good works? Absolutely not. Just the same can the governor, if he so pleases, pardon such a criminal? Of course he can. Still, there is something the criminal MUST do, there is an attitude that MUST be reflected by the criminal to receive a pardon IF the governor is indeed fair and just, and attitudes are tied inseparably to intents of the heart, this very initial intent being none other than a ‘work’ in one sense of the word. The governor MUST witness from the criminal a repentant attitude and a change of heart towards his former criminal behavior if the governor is even to consider such a pardon for the criminal.

    What kind of governor would pardon a criminal from prison who had not exhibited true remorse for his crimes? Would not the governor have to be satisfied in his or her mind that IF they pardoned such a criminal that they would not return to commit the same crime or one of like heinous behavior upon society again and that such a criminal possessed and exhibited a true change of heart and attitude towards their former behavior? There are indeed certain conditions that the criminal must meet, works that such a one must of necessity do in order to have the opportunity for a pardon if such an opportunity is offered. These works on the part of the prisoner are in no way meritorious in nature, and in no way force the governor to grant such a one a pardon on their account. Just the same, there are definite conditions or works one must do in order for the governor to consider the pardon. These works are thought of in the sense of ‘not without which,’ not ‘that for the sake of.’ It can properly be stated that one is not pardoned due to any works (in one sense of the word ‘works’ in the sense of ‘that for the sake of’) of the prisoner, but just the same it can be said ‘without works’ (in another sense of the word, that being in the sense of ‘not without which’) one will never see the opportunity to receive a pardon.

    Can you see how that works can be thought of as necessary for a pardon, or in the sense of “not without which,” yet at the same time no amount of works can be thought of as “that for the sake of” or forcing the governor to pardon the criminal on the account of works performed by the criminal?

    Rather than to say that we are saved ‘because’ we repent, I would say that ‘unless we repent’ we shall not be saved. Again. repentance and all conditions of salvation are always thought of in the sense of ‘not without which,’ NOT ‘that for the sake of.’
     
    #101 Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 9, 2007
  2. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me first say, I loved your answer!

    Now, moving on!

    Would it be safe to say that Baptism falls under the same umbrella as repentance? I guess what I’m saying is that “baptism is not a work”, but unless we repent and unless we are baptised we shall not be saved?

    Mark 16:16 he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believes not shall be damned.

    Acts 2:38 And Peter said unto them, Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the Remission of sins.
     
    #102 Pickettman, Oct 10, 2007
  3. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: I'm not moving :laugh:

    Seriously, I would just say for now that I do not believe ‘water’ baptism is a condition of salvation. I certainly would encourage believers to be baptized, but subsequent to not antecedent of salvation.

    There are at least seven baptisms spoken of in Scripture as I remember. It is highly likely that the baptism spoken of that you mention in the passage referred to is the baptism into Christ which is a spiritual baptism. I do not see Christ or the apostles, other than John, placing great emphasis on ‘water’ baptism. Certainly it was done, but again not to be saved but as a sign that they had been saved.

    I have no problems with groups that do not even practice baptism. I do not agree with them, but neither do I believe it is a salvation issue. If one looks at "George Fox, the Red Hot Quaker" (a book title by the way) one will find that he did not partake of any of the ordinances of the church and for very good reasons considering the wrong emphasis the church was placing on them in his day. I believe he was lead of the Lord as much as any one is or has been.
     
    #103 Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 10, 2007
  4. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jesus said "You must be born of the Water and the Spirit" (John 3:5)

    One might say that this is not speaking of water baptism. But a closer look at scripture reveals it does.

    The Great Commission was recorded in Matt 28 as “…baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of The Son, and of The Holy Ghost…”

    In Luke 24:45-49 Jesus said that “…Repentance and Remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations beginning in Jerusalem…”

    All three verses (John 3, Mat 28, and Luke 24 are all fulfilled in the book of Acts. Wouldn’t you agree?

    Acts 2 is the first mention of Peter using the Keys he received in Mat 16. The men in Acts 2 were pricked in there heart and asked Peter and the rest of the disciples “What must we do” Peter said “Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Then they that they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls (Acts 2:38-41)

    Acts 8 we find the Samaritans being baptized (Acts 8:12-16)
    Acts 8:36 The eunuch was baptized. The Chariot was commanded to stand still so they could go down into the water. As soon as his profession of faith was made.
    Acts 9, Acts 22 Paul was baptized. “…Arise and be baptized, and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord. (Acts 22:16)
    Acts 10 Cornelius and his house were Commanded to be baptized.(Acts 10:47)
    Acts 19 The disciples of John were re-baptized. (Acts 19:5)

    HP, I’m not trying to open up a discussion about baptism so with that being said, I really do understand where you are coming from but For Me if Repentance is not considered a work and without it you can’t be saved, I have to put baptism in the same arena.

    No one can say it better than Pedro. “Repent and be baptized… for the remission of sins…” There is no doubt in my mind that Acts 2:38 is the fulfillment of Luke 24:45-49. Jesus said teach repentance and remissions of sins in his name and Peter did!

    God Bless
     
    #104 Pickettman, Oct 11, 2007
  5. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. Are you saying that Baptism is essential to salvation?

    2. The Lord's Supper is never termed a work, but it too is commanded as a ritual, where baptism fits.
     
    #105 TCGreek, Oct 11, 2007
  6. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe that being born again is essential to salvation!

    God Bless
     
    #106 Pickettman, Oct 11, 2007
  7. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is baptism the point at which a person is born again?
     
    #107 TCGreek, Oct 11, 2007
  8. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pickettman,

    Rom 10:10 are the ONLY conditions for salvation: "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession [agreement with God] is made unto salvation. "

    a) believe and b) confess. In order to agree with God, we have to disagree or repent of self -- that is, convert, turn from self to God.

    Since baptism is neither of these, I would have to conclude that it was one of the "works," like communion, that follows faith.

    To me, neither the Calvinists nor the SDA's are clear on this. Being 'born again' follows belief and confession/repentance.

    skypair
     
    #108 skypair, Oct 11, 2007
  9. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Absolutely not!

    All I am saying is, if Repentance is not constituted as a work, neither is baptism!

    Being born again is something we must do! It is a step of faith that we must take. So someone could argue the fact that the “New Birth” is a work.

    Obedience to Christ is the only way one will ever find salvation, for without it you cannot put your complete trust in him! Heb 5:9.

    So I submit to you that obedience is not a work!

    God Bless
     
    #109 Pickettman, Oct 12, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 12, 2007
  10. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: May I submit to you that indeed obedience is a work, but not thought of in the sense of ‘that for the sake of?’ :)

    Why is not obedience a work? Is it not just as you say something that man must do? That is about as clear of a definition of a work as I can think of.


    Repentance and all acts of obedience, antecedent to and subsequent of salvation are all thought of in the sense of ‘not without which,’ again, NOT ‘that for the sake of.’

    It is not that works are bad and faith is good, for even faith is something we must exercise, or accomplish, by the formation of intents. It is simply that regardless what man is called on to do, nothing he does is ever to be considered the grounds of forgiveness. Everything man is called on to do is a condition that in no way is meritorious in nature in regards to our justification or salvation.
     
    #110 Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 12, 2007
  11. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    How do you do sky!

    Belief is the first step of anything we ever do. If we do not believe in something we can never fully submit. Would you agree?

    But just because we believe in Jesus, that in it’s self does not constitute salvation.

    It will take Obedience to Christ.

    Example: Let’s say I believe in Christ but I do not wish to Repent of my sins! Is that person saved?

    I’m not sure that confession and repentance is one in the same! As you stated, confession is an agreement. I confess Christ so I agree to do what he says.

    Repentance is a change in one’s mind. Christ shows me a better way, His Spirit convicts me, I Repent, and He forgives!

    You see, Repentance is something we do. So if we are saved at Repentance, then some would say that’s a work.

    Again, I say repentance is not a work but an act of obedience. And if we obey the word of God, we will find salvation which is in Christ.

    God Bless
     
    #111 Pickettman, Oct 12, 2007
  12. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    So if a person who has repented and believed says he is born again without ever being baptized in water, Is he truly born again?
     
    #112 TCGreek, Oct 12, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 12, 2007
  13. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will answer that like this. If a person believes that being “born of the water” represents water baptism, then the person who has not been baptized is not truly born again.

    I believe if we do what Jesus says, we will be saved! Would you agree?

    God bless
     
    #113 Pickettman, Oct 12, 2007
  14. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. If you believe that only when a person is baptized that person is born again, then I see no need for you to be tentative in your belief.

    2. I believe a person is saved when he/she puts faith in Christ (Eph 2:8, 9).
     
    #114 TCGreek, Oct 12, 2007
  15. Pickettman

    Pickettman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jesus says "Ye must be born again" Nick said "No way, I dont understand" Jesus said "Ye must be born of the water and the spirit, that which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is Spirit..." (John 3:1-6)

    If you are a person who chooses to believe that "Water" equals baptism, then it's not at the point of baptism that a person's “New Birth” has taken place. Wouldn’t it have to be after the “Water & Spirit”?

    Where in scripture do we find actual hard core evidence of people experiencing the New Birth? Where do we actually see people being “Born Again?”

    Scripture is the only source any of us have to find the means of salvation. In John 5:39 Jesus said to search the scriptures for in them ye think ye have eternal life and they are they which testify of me.

    I know who the audience was that Jesus was speaking to, and I understand that he was speaking of our so called “Old Testament” when he spoke of "Scripture". But isn’t that just as much relevant to us as it was them. We are able to search the Scriptures to find out how we can obtain Eternal life as well.

    There has to be examples of people being “Born Again.” Where are they? Who were the people?

    Lord Bless
     
    #115 Pickettman, Oct 12, 2007
  16. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0




    HP: It may just be a slight error, but it does not say that he had to be born of “the water” as you wrongfully state. It states that one must be “born of water” and “of the Spirit.” To be born “of water” is simply referring to the natural birth Nicodemus had mentioned as possibly having to be repeated. Jesus told him once naturally is all you need but you do have to be born of the Spirit. Certainly anyone that knows something about child birth can readily see the connection between birth and water. There is no reference to baptism here unless you desire to classify the natural birth in water as a baptism.

    Where again did you say that Jesus stated that in order to be saved you needed to be baptized via the ordinance of baptism?
     
    #116 Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 12, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 12, 2007
  17. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. "Water and Spirit" is an echo of Eze 36 as part of what God is doing in the NT.

    2. The stress is on the Spirit: "Whatever is born of the flesh is flesh, and whatever is born of the Spirit is spirit" (v.6).

    3. John says, "But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God" (John 1:12, 13).

    4. In Scripture, those who believed have been born of God.
     
    #117 TCGreek, Oct 12, 2007
  18. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0



    HP: According to the verse you quote, how can you arrive at that conclusion? It does not say that those that believe ‘have been’ born again, it says that “to all who did receive Him.” Joh 1:12 "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:"

    Here 'receiving Him' is a stated condition of being born again, without which none are born again. They do not receive Him 'because they have been born again,' they receive Him 'in order to' be born again.
     
    #118 Heavenly Pilgrim, Oct 12, 2007
  19. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. "Born of God" is aorist passive and therefore, "Have been born of God" is a correct rendering.

    2. Neither does the text say, "believing" or "receiving Him" is a condition for being born of God.
     
    #119 TCGreek, Oct 12, 2007
  20. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where does it say the "saved" must be born again?
     
    #120 Brother Bob, Oct 12, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 6 of 8
Loading...