Mt. 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.......27 ¶ Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: 28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. Ro 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. Please read the following thoughtfully, prayerfully and carefully before responding. I believe that every point of the law is connected with and based upon one mutual priniciple, which when broken violates every point of the law as the very same principle that ultimately defines violation of one point of the law is the very same principle that defines violation of every point of that law. For example, if the initial violation of law occurs at the point of motive, and only one proper motive underlies the intial fulfillment of law then every law is equally violated when the wrong motive occurs in connection with any point of the law. Let us say that the only proper motive essential to initial fulfillment of any law is love and thus the initial violation of any law is the absence of love as the right motive then to initially violate one point of the law constitutes the same violation of every point of the law as every point's initial violation is the same. For example, take the commandments of murder and adultery. If violation of both laws occurs at the same INITIAL point (any other motive but love) then to violate that principled motive necessarily violates every point of the law because every point requires the same motive/principle (love) for initial obedience. Hence, violation of the law occurs at the level of motive. Only one motive underlies the whole law and therefore the initial fulfillment of any point requires the same motive. Thus, in reverse the absence of this right principle/motive violates every point of the law. Isn't this exactly why Christ could say the commandments of murder and adultery were already violated INTERNALLY by wrong ATTITUDES rather than the consequences of those attitudes or actions? Did not these wrong attitudes equally violate the only proper motive behind all commandments - love? Hence, a person manifesting the wrong motive is in violation of every point of the Law becasue every point of the law requires love to prevent its violation. Carefully reread what I have said and prayerfully consider it and I think you will see it is impossible to violate one point of the Law without violating every point and thus it is equally impossible to obey one point of the Law without obeying every point of the Law as disobedience and fulfillment are determined and defined at the point of motive.