What if SC had not fired?

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by Salty, Mar 14, 2007.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
    Matt had a good question from my "was the South justified"
    So I am starting a new thread. Thanks Matt


    Matt Black [​IMG] vbmenu_register("postmenu_975237", true);
    4,000 Posts Club




    [​IMG] RE: Was the South justified in firing on Ft Sumpter
    Interesting thread; another interesting question for me is "would there still have been a civil war if SC hadn't fired on Ft Sumter?" After all, this was before Virginia had seceded and Lincoln had called for volunteers, both of which flowed from the events of April 12-14 1861. Any opinions on this one?
     
  2. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    I suppose the question behind the question is "was Lincoln determined to have a war in any event?" If so, how well could that have been sold to the North without a casus belli like Ft Sumter? Could there have been a peaceful parting of the ways?
     
  3. bobbyd

    bobbyd
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think there was such a simmering of so many hot button issues (including, but not excluded to state's rights and slavery)...that if SC had not fired, someone else may have.
     
  4. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    So are you saying that secession alone made war inevitable?
     
  5. StefanM

    StefanM
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    72
    If the federals were able to resupply (and later to reinforce) Ft. Sumter, it seems to me that the tensions would only be increased.

    Geographically, Ft. Sumter is in a position to intercept trading vessels entering and exiting the harbor. If SC had not "gone to the mat" to oppose resupplying the fort, then I think that the federal government would have been far more likely to attempt more aggressive, albeit non-combat, measures.

    IMO, it was only a matter of time after secession before SC would attack Ft. Sumter. If they had waited longer to do so, they would have been in a far less desirable position.

    Just imagine if SC had delayed long enough for the Union navy to send a fleet to Charleston harbor to complement their fortified artillery battery!
     
  6. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lincoln did not "believe in" the Declaration of Indepndance and neither has any subsequent president. Lincoln would have found another reason to start the war.
     

Share This Page

Loading...