1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What is Sin?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Heavenly Pilgrim, Jan 29, 2010.

  1. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ro*3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

    "sinned"
    Strong's Greek Dictionary
    264. hamartano
    amartanw hamartano ham-ar-tan'-o
    perhaps from 1 (as a negative particle) and the base of 3313; properly, to miss the mark (and so not share in the prize), i.e. (figuratively) to err, especially (morally) to sin:--for your faults, offend, sin, trespass.


    Ro*3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

    "come short"
    Strong's Greek Dictionary
    5302. hustereo
    usterew hustereo hoos-ter-eh'-o
    from 5306; to be later, i.e. (by implication) to be inferior; generally, to fall short (be deficient):--come behind (short), be destitute, fail, lack, suffer need, (be in) want, be the worse.



    This is a perfect verse to use to define sin, just as DHK has said.

    I do not understand your argument, HP. Do you just like to disagree?
     
  2. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: You may not understand the implications of what you are saying, but in essence you are placing Strong’s on the same level as Scripture itself. Think about what you are saying carefully. Strongs nor any other man written dictionary or lexicon is God-inspired. I will say it again. The verse in question does not define sin in the least.
     
  3. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Is that your best argument? :laugh:

    Of course Strong's isn't on the same level as scripture. It is simply a dictionary of Greek words. It tells me exactly what "sin" meant in the original language of the NT. It's a great tool to help understand the meanings of words, which helps to understand scripture. It is certainly not wrong to use a dictionary when dealing with the translation of one language to another.


    So, since you do not approve of dictionaries, just what is YOUR definition of sin?
     
  4. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Sadly I just think he put his authority above the authority of God and Scripture.
     
  5. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me ask you DHK. Do you put Strongs or any other lexicon on the same level as Scripture? Are they inspired? Does the Scripture by itself define sin in the verse mentioned? If I mention the word 'sin' in a sentence, have I necessarily defined it?
     
  6. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    The Bible has spoken. You say no it hasn't. It means something else. That is denial, putting your authority above God.
    Since there is a question in your mind as to its meaning (for the Bible was written in Greek), a Greek lexicon is consulted to check on the exact meaning of the word in question. It is verified. You deny it still. You again put your philosophy, your authority above God and the Scriptures.
     
  7. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    DHK, are Greek lexicon's the inspired Word of God? Do you just suppose some might differ with others? Even if they did not, again, are they the Inspired Word of God?
     
  8. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    No translation is inspired. Only the original MSS are inspired. The Bible is preserved for us in the original languages--the Greek and the Hebrew. In answer to your question, then, the Greek lexicon will be far more accurate to the inspired MSS than a translation. For there is always meaning that is lost in a translation.
     
  9. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: Consider carefully your position. Uninspired men write lexicons and uninspired men, according to you, write translations. Why would one be subject to possible error that the other would not? Could not a particular bias drive a lexicon as well as a translation? If not why not?
     
  10. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    A language has a meaning. Translators translate the words in that language. Additionally, dictionaries and lexicons are written to show the translations.

    You're saying that Strongs and anyone else who translates language is lying?
     
  11. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    I suppose HP is opposed to using a Webster's dictionary to define an English word. :rolleyes:



    And this is just another rabbit trail that HP is famous for rather than actually engaging in a discussion.

    I will ask you again HP. What is YOUR definition of sin?
     
  12. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: It is not that I do not believe in dictionaries. I use them everyday……..with the help of the Holy Spirit to hopefully keep me from either my error or the error of another. Let me say this. I am a tradesman. I have been asked before by a customer if I do a perfect job. I have replied that if I had perfect walls, and perfect materials, I 'might', I said 'might' be able to do a perfect job, but I am still not certain that you, the customer, could be a perfect judge of the final product. :)

    I am just saying none of us are free from the possibility of error, even in understanding the dictionary dealing with spiritual matters.

    Oh, I almost forgot. You asked for my definition of sin. I personally like the one Wesley used : “nothing is sin, strictly speaking, but a voluntary transgression of the known will of God”.
     
  13. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4

    Would you agree that transgressing the known will of God is "missing the mark"?
     
  14. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    But God says "For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin." Is that only "voluntary transgressions of the known will of God"? I'll go with the Bible on this one rather than Wesley.
     
  15. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: Absolutely, in light of your clarification.:thumbs:

    I do not use that definition but rarely due to the vast number of individuals that would add, nor understand such a clarification.
     
  16. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: Why is Wesley’s definition contrary to the passage of ‘anything not of faith is sin?” Lets see. I wake up in the morning without faith in doing so, to Ann it might be sin? Only kidding, but I am trying to illustrate the point that God desires us to consider what sin entails and not simply apply a Scripture to anything that is not of faith necessarily. I stll like Wesley's definition. :thumbs:
     
  17. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    So we can ignore what God said in that verse? He really doesn't meant that anything not of faith is sin? He really meant something else?
     
  18. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Actually I think things not done in faith is referring to doing things which go against our conscience, or things which we know are contrary to God.
     
  19. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    HP, I've been following along and it is page four now. What is your point with this thread? You don't like the commonly agreed to definitions of sin so what would you like Christians to learn from this thread?

    What is it you see Christians doing wrong that is a result of these common defintions of sin you don't like?

    :jesus:
     
  20. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: Excellent insight Amy.:thumbsup:

    I might enlarge if I may on what you have said. I would add things that might appear to be even questionable according to our conscience as well. If we cannot come to a place of clarity that a certain intent is right, we should refrain until God makes it clear to us vis our conscience in light of everything we know to the point that we indeed can proceed in faith.
     
Loading...