What Modern versions based On the Majority Greek text?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by JesusFan, May 24, 2011.

  1. JesusFan

    JesusFan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Know NKJV based on TR text

    Any modern Bible based upon MT instead of the CT?
     
  2. RG2

    RG2
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    The one I know of is the WEB (World English Bible). It's public domain as well I believe. Disclaimer: I make no comments on the accuracy or lack there of, of this translation :)
     
    #2 RG2, May 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2011
  3. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Which majority text?
     
  4. JesusFan

    JesusFan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thought that the only edition was the second version by believe Zane C. Hodges, Arthur L. Farstad ?
     
    #4 JesusFan, May 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2011
  5. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Some people refer to the Robinson/Pierpont Byzantine Textform as the Majority Text too. Robinson's reasoned transmissionalism is often confused w/ Hodges & Farstad's method.

    Anywho... I think there is a translation in progress for the Byzantine text.
     
  6. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,074
    Likes Received:
    102
    There is Paul Esposito's English Majority Text Version, which combines the Hodges & Farstad text, the Robinson/Pierpont text and Wilbur Pickering's work. Which goes to show that there's not even agreement what the majority is.
     
  7. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,212
    Likes Received:
    192
    The WEB is actually based on Robinson/Pierpont's Byzantine Textform NT.
     
  8. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,212
    Likes Received:
    192
    There is clear agreement about what the majority text is among all legitimate textual critics. It is one of the four widely accepted families of Greek texts, also called the Byzantine (called the Syrian in Westcott/Hort's terminology). Where there is disagreement between the three Greek NTs you mentioned is in individual readings within the Byzantine, just as there is wide disagreement among scholars about many readings in the Alexandrian textual family.
     
  9. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    454
    Do you have any further details on this? I would be delighted if such a translation were produced, so long as it was a good one, using Formal Equivalence. My main problem with the NKJV is that it is produced by Nelson, whch has secular ownership. Still, the Labourer is worthy of his hire, I suppose.

    Steve
     

Share This Page

Loading...