1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What purpose does election and predestination serve?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by J.D., Jan 3, 2007.

  1. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi Reformedbeliever;
    Of course you're forgiven;
    You're right it is harder to talk about such things with out the visual expressions of eveyday conversations.
    MB
     
  2. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi JD;
    Your right that is one but, is only part of the whole picture.
    MB
     
  3. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    npetreley,

    Welcome to the debate. No, you're wrong "right out of the gate." :laugh: God coule see all things from before creation. He could then plan how He would respond in order to bring His plan to fruitition. Kinda like building an assembly line and then, at then taking the raw materials and putting them through. When scripture says that God "repented" that He had made man, you can know that in His foreknowledge, He realized He would have to intervene on bahalf of the last "pure" family. And so, when creation came down to that "workstation," the "process" He has ordained before creation was to send the flood.

    No. God wasn't "surprised" by Adam eating the forbidden fruit -- He foresaw it and preplanned how How He would restore him.

    Isn't that what Calvinism AND free will assert? Where is the believer that says that God's creation sinned on account of God commanded it to??

    Good. I was going to "let it slide" but realized that you really might not understand the order of events and logic of the rationale. :D

    skypair
     
  4. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
     
    #104 skypair, Jan 7, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 7, 2007
  5. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi J.D.,

    Actually, you are both "determinists" as refrombelievers puts it, right? I'm not trying to divide you -- just explaining my own view so far.

    So God chooses the "elect" and He chooses where and when to act? Do you see these events and "election" being in response to men? to their prayers, for instance? Does God say He will answer prayers?

    I agree God doesn't make them sin. And He does know the "elect" from before creation and does "preserve" the saints according to His positive plan. But don't you see that it is hard for me to believe that a God that answers prayer didn't just wait (in His foreknowledge) to hear men's prayers in order to save and to act much of the time?

    Sure, I see that. God is "passive" in our lives up to the instant that we pray to receive salvation. That moment is the moment that we quit being reprobates and become sons.

    Or "permission" of it, right?

    You make the defintion of "double preD" a function of time then. See, there was a point at which God waited to see whether a person would believe or not -- that's "forknowledge." Then there was a point at which God saw it wasn't gonna happen and permitted it in His plan -- predestined/foreordained it. Right?

    Yes, at a point in time that is true. But you are ignoring what came BEFORE He predestined -- FOREKNOWLEDGE. At that point, God had NOT predestined yet.

    Most Calvinists I debate with have this difficulty with timing. They say the 2 are different but as a practical matter, foreknowledge always comes out as "choosing" as does predestination. The cause is the same as the effect whereas with free will, the cause is foreknowledge and the effect is predestination.

    Calvinists commonly "blow off" free willers as "simplistic" regarding the word "foreknowledge." Friend, if there was a plan behind the plan -- predestination behind predestination as Calvinists appear to explain it -- it would be that God planned to bring BELIEVERS to salvation and then, through foreknowledge, chose those whom He foresaw would BELIEVED on Christ!

    Maybe we could summarize what Calvinists really believe this way -- they believe that the purpose of all creation is to choose certain people to salvation -- mostly Calvinists which is why many of them maintain that Calvinism IS the gospel. The salient flaw in Calvinism is they don't know how God chooses who He chooses (the coincidence that only believers are "chosen" going "right over their heads") but they certainly don't believe that mere man can choose God.

    Free will sees God's purpose as saving BELIEVERS through the Bible gospel. They believe that God's overarching plan permits mere man to choose salvation by acknowledging God and trusting Him.


    "Election" and "predestination" are the plans God has for those He foreknows as BELIEVERS. The very instant God foresaw that you would believe, God began influencing your life through His word to bring you to the "perfection of the stature of His Son." God does "act" on behalf of and through His saints as Noah, Abraham, Moses, etc. all attest. God planned to use Noah to save all mankind from destruction, for instance. He didn't let Cain's descendants to destroy creation as would surely have happened. God intervened through Noah and saved creation per His active plan.
     
  6. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you, reformbeliever -- I will go see if I need to edit my reply to you before reading this post.

    skypair
     
  7. reformedbeliever

    reformedbeliever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello MB. Not a lot of time tonight, but here is some answers I have just quickly and we can expound upon it later.

    There are so many scriptures that tell me that God is intimately involved in His creation. There are no sparrows that fall without Him knowing. He knows the count of the hair on your head. When you think about that and multiply it by the number of birds in the world and the number of people in the world..... He is pretty intimately involved. The amount of "memory" required to accomplish such task would not involve any of God's resources however.... to put it in computer terms........lol

    When we read Job, where God is asking Job where he was while God performed all that He performs, and when David is speaking of God's omnipresence and omniscience in Psalms 139.... I just can't imagine God not being intimately involved in His creation.

    The main thing is this... and its hard for us to put our brains around it I know... when He said I am the Alpha and Omega... He was not merely saying that He is the beginning and the end, He was saying I am that at the same time. In other words.... He is the I am. He is as He is. He has never changed. He remains constant.

    When biblical language speaks of God repenting of having made man, I believe that is anthropomorphic language. God does not change. Change involves a measurement of time. God is outside time. He is not bound by it. He created time for man. Remember, God is the I am.... He is the Alpha and Omega at the same time.

    Hope this helps you to understand what I believe. I look forward to debating with you. Maybe we both can learn from each other. Grace and peace.
     
  8. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    SK , ( that's a telecommunications company here in S.K.) I'd like to address a few things . You keep saying that God foresees what will transpire , then acts in response to His acquired knowledge . But no one will believe on their own accord . The Lord does not look into the future and determine to save someone who will turn to Him . Nobody can ( has the ability ) to do that . God has to intervene .

    You said that " The salient flaw in Calvinism is they don't know how God chooses ." Well , I thought we have been saying all along that it is due to His good pleasure -- to the praise of His glorious grace . Non-Cals usually accuse Calvinists of pretending to know the mind of God in such matters . We do not of course . But what He has revealed we will not deny . Yet we will not venture beyond what the Scripture opens up to us .

    Noah and the other seven were the elect remnant at that time . It was not God's plan to save all mankind through Noah . The Lord wanted Noah to preach to them and harden them in their sins , which is an effect of authentic preaching . Biblical messages will harden the hearts of some and soften the hearts of others .
     
  9. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    This is the fallacy of no third option. Either God foresaw things that didn't go according to His will and permitted it, or God commanded/force man to sin. But there's at least a third option you missed: God planned the fact that man would sin. Man still did it of his own volition, but it was according to God's will, not against God's will. This is the same concept as described in "You meant it for evil but God meant it for good." Not "God permitted it for good" but "God MEANT it for good".
     
  10. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I also believe that God is intimate with His creation.
    I also Believe God never changes simply because He knows what he is doing. (This doesn't mean He never changes His creations.) He also knows what we are doing and how we perceive. He knows everything so it would be impossible for us to surprise Him. He is God and knows all but still this doesn't mean we can say that He controls us in everything. This is why I say God doesn't wish to control everything man does. He has allowed us the freedom to choose whether or not we sin. As I see it if God did control everything man did. Man wouldn't sin, because God is sinless and won't even touch sin. God may allow man to be tempted to sin. God never tempts us to sin or cause us to sin against Himself. He doesn't have to, We are surrounded by it. Sin is everywhere even in our places of worship. As long as we live in these bodies we will be surrounded by it. Sin dwells in mans flesh saved or not. We have to fight the temptation to do it all the time. For us we seldom have relief from it because it seems man isn't able to be spiritually minded all the time.
    MB
     
  11. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not true. That is your flawed dogma of the TULIP.

    You need to realize from your own experience that men choose all the time. They even choose good sometimes. Where do you get -- except by misusing scripture -- that no one can hear. Rom 1 says every man "hears" and all are "without excuse." Let's go over those verses where you think you find "inability." (I find it doubly curious that Calvin describes man as "totally depraved" but then makes this to mean "totally unable." The 2 are NOT the same thing, rippon.

    I was quoting R.C. Srpoul in his book Chosen by God.[/b] In it, he makes that confession.

    Not me! :D In fact, I hear so many Calvinists talk about godly things as "these are things we have no right to inquire into" that I believe much of Calvinism is dogma -- things that must be believed without proof.

    Which is precisely why you should consider whether God has answered some of the "unknowns" in Calvinism. What is "sin nature?" Calvin says it is "sin guilt" despite Isa 18:20 which says we can't inherit sin from our fathers. Calvinism has no separate plan for Israel, yet God clearly does. Calvinism can't explain why the Bible says that Christ died for the sins of the whole world and yet they teach He died only for the elect. or how grace is irresistible. or how "perseverance of the saints" (unlike free will's "preservation of the saints") isn't the teaching of "works salvation."

    I believe you SHOULD have more of the mind of Christ/God than you do.

    Very commendable! :D

    Well, by "mankind," I meant post-flood -- the succession of mankind on the earth. Sorry I wasn't more explicit.

    skypair
     
  12. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Viola! Just what I meant! How else could God divide the believers from the unbelievers?? God's plan "PERMITTED" the behavior of sin to "weed out" those who wouldn't love/believe Him. Then He allowed for those who would believe Him to be saved. He did NOT "will" for man to sin/disobey. He even told Adam NOT to eat thereof. That doesn't jibe with a God who wants/wills Adam to sin.

    Big picture: Did God make creation to a) "be glorified in His saints" or b) to choose a random crossection of mankind (or maybe just Presbryterians) to live with Him in eternity? I mean, again, you might find another option -- this is just to get you thinking. Who does God obviously appear to "choose" -- believers or random people?

    Uh-uh-uh! :tongue3: According to God's PLAN, not His will, remember? God didn't will that Adam sin -- but His plan was able to be accomplished in spite of it.

    Hmm. But God did "permit" it for evil upon Joseph first, right? You're not saying that God wanted and caused Joseph to be sold into slavery, then imprisoned falsely, etc. are you? I believe those were the acts of sinful men, not God.

    skypair
     
  13. reformedbeliever

    reformedbeliever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can agree with most of what you have said. I believe that God is in absolute control however. If He directly controls some times and allows other influences at other times, or indirectly controls us.... it is the same thing... He is still in absolute control of His creation.
     
  14. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes, I'm saying exactly that he wanted it and caused it, though not by force or by puppetry, so please don't go there. God meant it for good, and good is what came of it. The Bible says God MEANT it for good, not permitted it for good.
     
  15. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    God means EVERYTHING for good, npetreley. Outcome depends on whether one is a believer or unbeliever. Perhaps I misspoke or you didn't understand. :D

    skypair
     
  16. reformedbeliever

    reformedbeliever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    0
    God does not have to have you believe in order to accomplish all He desires. His truth is truth, whether you believe it or not. He will accomplish all His purposes, whether you believe it or not. There are many who do not believe. Do you think that will frustrate God's plans?

    If they do not believe, does that mean God can not accomplish His purposes? If so, there are many who do not believe... so God is defeated huh?

    I don't think so. I believe He is sovereign and has the right to dispose of His creation as He sees fit.... and will.
     
  17. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Absolutely true!! Cause the other thing that works while God doesn't is His law. As an unbeliever, the law works God's will in your life automatically -- naturally! His law is sovereign over you though He is not so far as you are concerned!


    Which is what I just said another way. Good!

    Oh, no. God moves creation toward HIS purposes through believers. He hasn't quite made "His enemies His footstools" yet. I take that to mean that He permits them freedom to act, though ineffectually, in opposition to His will and purposes for now.

    And "He sees fit" to redeem believers and has set a destiny upon unbelievers. :D

    skypair
     
  18. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    I guess I don't understand your meaning. The outcome of all things is determined by God. Not even a sparrow falls to the ground apart from His will. Note carefully that it says apart from His will, not apart from his knowledge or foreknowledge. The hairs on your head are numbered. It doesn't say God knows the number, it says He numbers them. Of course in my case, He doesn't have to go much beyond double digits.
     
  19. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    So then, it's not a strawman. Arminians/Pelagians really do believe that God is dependent on man, not man dependent on God?
     
  20. psalms109:31

    psalms109:31 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trust and belief

    To trust in Jesus to save us, it is us depending on God to save us, not God depended on us.

    WE are totally depended on God.

    The wages of our sin is death, not belief. So it is what God has done that saved us.

    To believe is to stop trusting in what you can do, but what God has done for us.
     
Loading...