In all 4 accounts, something different is recorded. So much so that if you conflate all the readings together, you arrive at a "saying" that is actually not recorded in the Bible. Mt 27:37 - And over his head they put the charge against him, which read, "This is Jesus, the King of the Jews." Mk 15:26 - And the inscription of the charge against him read, "The King of the Jews." Lk 23:38 - There was also an inscription over him, "This is the King of the Jews." Jn 19:19 - It read, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." Here is what I mean. Most conservative evangelicals will say that what was probably written over Jesus was a combination of all 4: "This is Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." My question then, is there a problem that this conflated reading never occurs in the 4 evangelists??? Aren't we adding to Scripture w/ that assumption.