What's wrong with Alberto Rino Gonzales?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by church mouse guy, Jul 10, 2005.

  1. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    Almost everything is wrong with Alberto Rino Gonzales if you are talking about putting him on the court. Why don't we start a list?
     
  2. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    From the two minutes of news coverage I've heard about him, he is pro-choice.
     
  3. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    sorry, double post.
     
  4. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    Yeah, Kiffin and others have shown that el señor Don Alberto Rinoceronte Gonzales is pro-abortion. The question is, will Bush doublecross the conservatives in the GOP again the way he has on excessive spending and nominate el señor Don Alberto Rinoceronte Gonzales--The Mr. Lord Alberto Rhinoceros Gonzales?
     
  5. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Are you talking about the current Attorney General Gonzales or someone else?
     
  6. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would also be afraid of Mr. Gonzales' view on the Constitution, he is on the record as stating that he believes it is a living document and that only the nine members of the SCOTUS have the ability to understand and interpret it. He also has connections with La Raza, which should be of some concern.
     
  7. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    For those of us who are not sure tell us what La Raza is and then provide evidence of his connection.
     
  8. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    The National Council of La Raza, the nation's largest Hispanic civil rights organization, is one of the biggest groups pushing for open borders,

    Here are some articles about Gonzales' connection with La Raza:

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41628
    http://www.rense.com/general59/larazaconfirmsgonzales.htm
    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/10/175518.shtml
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18406-2005Mar8.html
    http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_1034.shtml
     
  9. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    JGrubbs

    Thanks.

    If Bush picks a Latino I hope its Miguel Estrada who withdrew his name from nomination to the Circuit Court rather than kneel to the dems.
     
  10. JamesBell

    JamesBell
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Estrada would be great, but there is next to no chance. He removed his name because the dems were going to filibuster him until the Rapture if they needed to.

    My favorite candidate is someone that happens to be Hispanic, but that has nothing to do with why I like the man. I support Emilio Garza, a constructionalist that won't let stupid political stunts get in the way of his legal decisions.

    As for what is wrong with Gonzales... he would have voted for the recent Emminent Domain decision, which shows me he has no business on the Court.
     
  11. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree, Miguel Estrada would be a good choice, based on what I know about him. While I have seen his name mentioned, I don't know anything about Emilio Garza. La Raza was opposed to Estrada on the same issues that they support Gonzales, racial profiling, immigration policy and "workers rights".

    From what I can tell, I think Janice Rogers Brown would make a good justice on the SCOTUS!

    Here are some short bios for some of the possible nominees:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/01/AR2005070100756.html
     
  12. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    Bush liked Miguel Estrada but that is another case that drives me nuts. Estrada is a Democrat that Clinton left as unfinished business. I don't know why a GOP President should take up the cause of a Democrat, do you? I wouldn't. I would say to Estrada, well, you are a nice guy and would be a good judge, etc, etc, etc, but you have to sit it out until your party gets back into power which I hope is never.
     
  13. JamesBell

    JamesBell
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Funny thing, I could care less what party a judge belongs to. They aren't supposed to be setting policy. If they understand that, and are willing to rule using the laws of our nation, they can serve and do well.
     
  14. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    Well, there is no point for the Republican Party after 70 years of Democrat lies to go around appointing Democrat judges. When are the Democrats going to turn states evidence on FDR and tell the truth on Herbert Hoover? The Democrats have been in the smear business since FDR and 1932. They ruled for 70 years. They support abortion. They belong in the garbage can of history.
     

Share This Page

Loading...