When does the drilling restart

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Salty, Jun 23, 2010.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,065
    Likes Received:
    214
  2. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would this be considered to be "judicial activism"?
     
  3. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    No - it falls under the heading of checks and balances
     
  4. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    153
    The judge has a Hummer and needs lots of gas. :laugh:

    Sure it is judicial activism ... but then what court decision is not activism in one way or another?
     
  5. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Of course not Ken, that only applies when conservative rulings are involved.

    In other words, if we like it it is checks and balances, if we don't like it it is judicial activism.
     
    #5 NaasPreacher (C4K), Jun 23, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 23, 2010
  6. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    153
    Judge Who Nixed Drilling Ban Had Oil Investments

    Looks like a conflict of interest to me. Ethically he should have removed himself from the case.

     
  7. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    How did you reach this conclusion?

    The report provided no information as to the extent of his investment holdings.
     
  8. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    153
    You didn't read the report! The amount was shown in the 2nd paragraph.

    Anyway, the amount does not matter. To own stock in a company and then sitting as a judge in a case that affects that company is unethical and is a conflict of interest ... his monetary interests. An honest judge would have removed himself from the case.

    From the same report.

    Other Gulf Coast judges have been honest.

     
    #8 Crabtownboy, Jun 23, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 23, 2010
  9. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, I did read the report.

    But the figure of $15,000 does not tell us enough to know whether this amount is material to his entire investment holdings.

    Without knowing if the amount of the investment is material there is no knowing if there is a conflict of interest.

    By your thinking owning one share of stock would be a conflict of interest.
     
  10. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    I would agree with that.
     
  11. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    153
    One share is material interest. Didyou notice how many other companies he has investments in ... and you think he has no material interests.

    Perhaps $15,000 is such a small amount to you, but I bet to most people $15,000 in one company would make them very interested in the health of the company.

    He had material interest. Doing so makes his judgment suspect. He was unethical.
     

Share This Page

Loading...