When the going gets rough

I do wonder, does the 5 page limit end when it reaches the fifth page or when the 5th page is full?

Moderator bias will decide? </font>[/QUOTE]Your accusations and continuous attacks are getting old, my brother. The thread can be closed anytime on page five.

You are more than welcome to start a thread on the Job passage at anytime.

 

Frank, you just won't address any problems you've created with your own posts. Again, let's see some proof that the NKJV is false. Your attempt at using Job for such has fallen flat.

Next, the human army in question with Elisha and his servant were SYRIANS, not ASsyrians. Those were two entirely-separate nations.

Frank Betz: Exactly as I had predicted, the mv proponent put to the iron, then the moderator invokes his rule, when other times he doesn't?

Consistency is a virtue, but not in BB.

I beg to differ. The moderators have allowed this thread to run somewhat longer than they've allowed others. Both C4K & Squire Robertsson have given plenty of advance notice as to when this thread will be closed. I mean, what else would you want? Squire has placed a "no earlier than 9 PM tonight" limit on this thread! If it reacher 12 pages in that time, those pages will be allowed to stand.If there's any bias, it's toward YOU, giving you a fair chance to back up your mostly-frivolous statements. Furthermore, they've reminded you that you're free to start another thread, especially about Job 24.

When you call any mv a Bible, then delete what is given as evdences, calling it an attack on the Bible, when it was never an attack on the Bible, I guess not, but then....

Calling a Bible some derogatory name is evidence ONLY of the attitude of the messenger. Just because you had the nerve, or the ignorance to say it doesn't make it true.

And I'd rather fall into the hand of God than the hands of the enemy, but until then, my heart will go on singing, with Joy ,I'll carry on!!

You've been carrying on quite a bit lately!

The "NKJV" attacks God by introduicing He is guilty of leaving no man sure of life, lying in wait to ensnare the man with wicked devices, in contradiction to what the CONTEXT proclaims!!


Evidently your knowledge about that context is nil. As I asked you yesterday, ARE YOU GUARANTEED TOMORROW? Chances are 99.99999% we'll all be here tomorrow, but anything less than 100% isn't SURE, nor a GUARANTEE. Is there any Scripture behind my statement? Yes. Remember the parable of the wealthy farmer who, as he went to bed, planned to build bigger barns to hold the bumper crop he was expecting? God called him a FOOL for leaving Him outta his plans. In this parable, He is reminding us that no one is guaranteed tomorrow except by GOD'S WILL. That's the premise in Job 24.

You're gonna hafta do a LOT better than THAT in your attack against the NKJV. So far, you've tossed a spitball against a tank.

Proof, again, proof.... The KJB still precedence over the taunted versions of today, Scripturally, that is. Accurately too, I might add.

You call for proof & then make a statement calling for proof, which you don't provide. But I shouldn't expect anything else from someone who says God didn't mean "for ever" when He said "for ever". After all, that's in the KJV you hold in such high esteem. By your own words, you seem to believe your KJV only so far as it agrees with the man-made myth about it.

You referred to some statements about Apollos as "heresy" because he at first was teaching Scripture, but not about Christ. We reminded you that, like Paul, he wasn't DENYING Christ; he simply didn't know about Him. Were YOU born with a knowledge of Christ, or did you acquire faith in Him by hearing/reading God's word? Both Paul and Apollos immediately "mended their ways" when they learned of Christ and came to Him in submission and belief. But before their salvations, both those men were zealous for God, and preached about Him ACCORDING TO THEIR LIMITED KNOWLEDGE. Nothing heretical there...they couldn't have been heretical about what they DIDN'T KNOW.

You've tried to dodge your own statement that "for ever" has a limit, along with a whole lotta other hooey you've posted. Evidently you CANNOT back up nor prove a thing you say. You've had plenty of chances in this thread. C'ya in the next one, GOD WILLING.


Just goes to show ya don't hafta have a blizzard nor dandruff to see a few FLAKES...

 

FrankBetz asked:

I will also add that the moderator is very possibly lying in wait for a slip on my behaqlf to break some rule?

Sheesh! Stop being such a drama queen.