Replacement meaning the promises for the Children of Israel are now null and void & the Church is now the recipient of God's promises to Israel. Where did this idea originate? It certainly cannot be construed from the "grafting in" Scripture. I've seen it posted & implied that God's Promises to Israel no longer exist and those promises now apply to the Church since Israel rejected Christ as the Messiah. I say this is hogwash. God's promises to Israel are just the same today as ever. God does not change. Neither does His Word. So where did this arrogant "replacement theology" come from?