Who Is On The Lord's Side?

I have proven the NIV and can equivicably claim that it, along with the KJV, is God's inspired, infallible Word. The same can be said for many other translations as well - they have been proven by Christians for years.

 

I guess God changed sides and scripture changed meaning in 1611.

 

In defense of the Old Paths and The Old Time Religion, I proclaim with great zeal that all faithful translations are the inspired, inherent and providentially preserved Word of God for the English speaking !

Furthermore, I equate pronouncing that all other versions are in great error and that all other version disregard God`s due order to be profanity--treating something sacred with abuse, irreverance and contempt.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good,
and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light
for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet
for bitter !

 

That last line is a Jack Hyles "message." It was a truly hilarious message to listen to this guy rant and rave without any biblical basis whatsoever.

It is interesting that those who want the "old paths" reject the "old manuscripts." How "old" do we want to be? Unfortunately, not old enough to hold biblical doctrine.

 

Ditto posts #2-5

 

Kidz-For-Him:In defense of the Old Paths and The Old Time
Religion, I proclaim with great zeal that The King
James Bible is the only inspired, inherent and
providentially preserved Word of God for the
English speaking !

Scriptural proof, please?


Furthermore, I equate all other versions with the
" New Cart " of I Chronicles 13:7-10 in which out of
great error and disregard for God`s due order ,
caused the death of Uzza .

Once again, Scriptural proof, please? It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing-the "swing" of Scripture to back such statements.

 

Amen brother, preach it!

ScottEmerson,
your NIV and all other versions will never stand up against the King James Bible.

 

Scripture proof, scripture proof. There's no scripture that tells you not to smoke, so do you believe its okay to do that?

I equate modernist to doubting Thomas. They have to see to believe. Try using faith in the God that saved you.

 

I have faith that the NIV is God's inspired Word. I am using that faith that God gave me. And the NIV has more than held its own against the KJV since it was translated. God has used it to touch many, many, many lives.

 

Amen, Brother ScottEmerson -- Preach it!

 

Which edition?
With or without the Church of Rome source of heresy Apocrypha?
With or without the marginal choices of variants?
With or without the Daily "Scripture" reading Guide with selections from the Apocrypha?

Produced by the Church of England who persecuted and killed our spiritual brethren.

Who, (then and to this day) hold several heretical or erroneous doctrine concerning, Baptism, the Lord's Table, Church offices, government, etc...

Who is on the Lord's side?

HankD

 

I agree that God can take something like the NIV and present the Gospel message, but it will never match up to the King James Bible, for, the King James Bible does not back down, it tells it like it is. For example:

Leviticus 18:22 - Sodomy
KJB - Thou shall not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

NIV - Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman: that is detestable.

There is quite a degree of difference between the meaning of the words, abomination and detestable.

 

No, there's not. The NIV might not match up to the KJV but it is certainly not because "abomination" and "detestable" are dissimilar in meaning.

This is the kind of argumentation that makes me laugh ...

 

Both of them seem abhorrent to God. And most people know what detestable means, where as abomination may not have the same impact. Both are okay.

 

"Who is on the Lord's side?" Hey, you corrected the KJV! It's "Who is on the LORD's (YHWH) side?" Exodus 32:26

 

Not according to the dictionary!

Sorry, but it looks as if you are wrong again.

 

Homebound:ScottEmerson,
your NIV and all other versions will never stand up against the King James Bible.

Didn't know they were fighting-except in the fevered imagination of some Onlyists...

Scripture proof, scripture proof. There's no scripture that tells you not to smoke, so do you believe its okay to do that?

Once again, a non-answer to an easy little common-sense question. The KJVO myth is a man-made doctrine about SCRIPTURE. To have any veracity, it MUST BE SUPPORTED by Scripture, since there's no higher written authority. Therefore, it's quite sensible to ask for Scriptural support for a doctrine about Scripture.

BTW, here's a Scripture that tells me not to smoke, since I KNOW smoking would harm my body-1 Corinthians 3:16Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.
1 Corinthians 6:15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Certainly not! 16Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with her? For "the two," He says, "shall become one flesh."[2] 17But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him.
18Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. 19Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's.

Knowing tobacco is a smelly weed laced with insecticide, I know from just those scriptures above that I'd be wrong to put that into my body. See, there IS Scripture against smoking, although it doesn't mention it directly. Now, can you provide any Scripture that even IMPLIES that the KJVO myth is correct?



I equate modernist to doubting Thomas. They have to see to believe. Try using faith in the God that saved you.

See WHAT? What I see in the KJVO myth is a man-made false doctrine utterly lacking in any supportine evidence whatsoever.

Faith? I have absolute faith that GOD CAN DO ANYTHING, and that He provides His word AS HE CHOOSES, without regard to man's silly little imaginations of how He should do it. The Onlyist's faith, far as God's word goes,(not his/her salvation-I don't question most KJVOs' faith in JESUS CHRIST!) is placed into a group of Anglican translators and a doctrine based upon the writings of a big kahoona of a KNOWN CULT.

BY WHOSE AUTHORITY are you KJVO? BY WHOSE AUTHORITY do you tell me I should be KJVO?

 

Skan, isn't the main difference between abomination and detestable is that ab...is a noun & det...is an adjective?

Only a KJVO would hammer at something so irrelevant, and only because he/she is otherwise clueless as how to justify their myth.

 

Well, you do seem to know. So which one are you?