Who Is On The Lord's Side?

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Kidz-4-HIM, Feb 25, 2004.

  1. Kidz-4-HIM

    Kidz-4-HIM
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    In defense of the Old Paths and The Old Time
    Religion, I proclaim with great zeal that The King
    James Bible is the only inspired, inherent and
    providentially preserved Word of God for the
    English speaking !
    Furthermore, I equate all other versions with the
    " New Cart " of I Chronicles 13:7-10 in which out of
    great error and disregard for God`s due order ,
    caused the death of Uzza .
    The history of these so called bibles remind me of
    King Saul`s armour in I Samuel 17:39 as David
    said...I cannot go with these; for I have not proved
    them . And David put them off of him .
    It`s time that Christians stand up for the bible
    that this nation was founded upon . It`s time to put
    away this false doctrine of Westcott & Hort and
    rise up against the Zondervons of this world and
    say enough is enough. They have no authority to
    change and omit the Words of our God in direct
    rebellion of Matthew 5:18 and Revelation 22:18 !
    Psalms 138:2... for thou hast magnified thy
    WORD above all thy name. Things that are
    different are not the same .
    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good,
    and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light
    for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet
    for bitter ! Keep your stinking dirty feet out of our
    drinking water !!!
     
  2. ScottEmerson

    ScottEmerson
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have proven the NIV and can equivicably claim that it, along with the KJV, is God's inspired, infallible Word. The same can be said for many other translations as well - they have been proven by Christians for years.
     
  3. BrianT

    BrianT
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess God changed sides and scripture changed meaning in 1611.
     
  4. russell55

    russell55
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    In defense of the Old Paths and The Old Time Religion, I proclaim with great zeal that all faithful translations are the inspired, inherent and providentially preserved Word of God for the English speaking !

    Furthermore, I equate pronouncing that all other versions are in great error and that all other version disregard God`s due order to be profanity--treating something sacred with abuse, irreverance and contempt.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good,
    and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light
    for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet
    for bitter !
     
  5. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    That last line is a Jack Hyles "message." It was a truly hilarious message to listen to this guy rant and rave without any biblical basis whatsoever.

    It is interesting that those who want the "old paths" reject the "old manuscripts." How "old" do we want to be? Unfortunately, not old enough to hold biblical doctrine.
     
  6. Orvie

    Orvie
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto posts #2-5
     
  7. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Kidz-For-Him:In defense of the Old Paths and The Old Time
    Religion, I proclaim with great zeal that The King
    James Bible is the only inspired, inherent and
    providentially preserved Word of God for the
    English speaking !


    Scriptural proof, please?


    Furthermore, I equate all other versions with the
    " New Cart " of I Chronicles 13:7-10 in which out of
    great error and disregard for God`s due order ,
    caused the death of Uzza .


    Once again, Scriptural proof, please? It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing-the "swing" of Scripture to back such statements.
     
  8. RaptureReady

    RaptureReady
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen brother, preach it!

    ScottEmerson,
    your NIV and all other versions will never stand up against the King James Bible.
     
  9. RaptureReady

    RaptureReady
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scripture proof, scripture proof. There's no scripture that tells you not to smoke, so do you believe its okay to do that?

    I equate modernist to doubting Thomas. They have to see to believe. Try using faith in the God that saved you.
     
  10. ScottEmerson

    ScottEmerson
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have faith that the NIV is God's inspired Word. I am using that faith that God gave me. And the NIV has more than held its own against the KJV since it was translated. God has used it to touch many, many, many lives.
     
  11. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Brother ScottEmerson -- Preach it! [​IMG]
     
  12. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,165
    Likes Received:
    322
    Which edition?
    With or without the Church of Rome source of heresy Apocrypha?
    With or without the marginal choices of variants?
    With or without the Daily "Scripture" reading Guide with selections from the Apocrypha?

    Produced by the Church of England who persecuted and killed our spiritual brethren.

    Who, (then and to this day) hold several heretical or erroneous doctrine concerning, Baptism, the Lord's Table, Church offices, government, etc...

    Who is on the Lord's side?

    HankD
     
  13. RaptureReady

    RaptureReady
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that God can take something like the NIV and present the Gospel message, but it will never match up to the King James Bible, for, the King James Bible does not back down, it tells it like it is. For example:

    Leviticus 18:22 - Sodomy
    KJB - Thou shall not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

    NIV - Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman: that is detestable.

    There is quite a degree of difference between the meaning of the words, abomination and detestable.
     
  14. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, there's not. The NIV might not match up to the KJV but it is certainly not because "abomination" and "detestable" are dissimilar in meaning.

    This is the kind of argumentation that makes me laugh ...
     
  15. ScottEmerson

    ScottEmerson
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both of them seem abhorrent to God. And most people know what detestable means, where as abomination may not have the same impact. Both are okay.
     
  16. Pastor KevinR

    Pastor KevinR
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2001
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Who is on the Lord's side?" Hey, you corrected the KJV! It's "Who is on the LORD's (YHWH) side?" ;) Exodus 32:26
     
  17. skanwmatos

    skanwmatos
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not according to the dictionary!
    Sorry, but it looks as if you are wrong again. [​IMG]
     
  18. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Homebound:ScottEmerson,
    your NIV and all other versions will never stand up against the King James Bible.


    Didn't know they were fighting-except in the fevered imagination of some Onlyists...

    Scripture proof, scripture proof. There's no scripture that tells you not to smoke, so do you believe its okay to do that?

    Once again, a non-answer to an easy little common-sense question. The KJVO myth is a man-made doctrine about SCRIPTURE. To have any veracity, it MUST BE SUPPORTED by Scripture, since there's no higher written authority. Therefore, it's quite sensible to ask for Scriptural support for a doctrine about Scripture.

    BTW, here's a Scripture that tells me not to smoke, since I KNOW smoking would harm my body-1 Corinthians 3:16Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.
    1 Corinthians 6:15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Certainly not! 16Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with her? For "the two," He says, "shall become one flesh."[2] 17But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him.
    18Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. 19Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's.

    Knowing tobacco is a smelly weed laced with insecticide, I know from just those scriptures above that I'd be wrong to put that into my body. See, there IS Scripture against smoking, although it doesn't mention it directly. Now, can you provide any Scripture that even IMPLIES that the KJVO myth is correct?



    I equate modernist to doubting Thomas. They have to see to believe. Try using faith in the God that saved you.

    See WHAT? What I see in the KJVO myth is a man-made false doctrine utterly lacking in any supportine evidence whatsoever.

    Faith? I have absolute faith that GOD CAN DO ANYTHING, and that He provides His word AS HE CHOOSES, without regard to man's silly little imaginations of how He should do it. The Onlyist's faith, far as God's word goes,(not his/her salvation-I don't question most KJVOs' faith in JESUS CHRIST!) is placed into a group of Anglican translators and a doctrine based upon the writings of a big kahoona of a KNOWN CULT.

    BY WHOSE AUTHORITY are you KJVO? BY WHOSE AUTHORITY do you tell me I should be KJVO?
     
  19. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Skan, isn't the main difference between abomination and detestable is that ab...is a noun & det...is an adjective?

    Only a KJVO would hammer at something so irrelevant, and only because he/she is otherwise clueless as how to justify their myth.
     
  20. Alcott

    Alcott
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,457
    Likes Received:
    93
    Well, you do seem to know. So which one are you?
     

Share This Page

Loading...