Who Won The Debate? Reviews Go To Obama

I watched to entire debate and think that Obama won hands down. I know, however, that the right-wingers here will never admit it, not even when on January 20, 2009 Obama is sworn in as President of the United States, I hope.

 

Well there we have it then.

Case closed.:tonofbricks:

 

You are right, it's almost "case closed." As the economy slowly gets worse, McCain's support will slowly evaporate. As Bill Clinton said, "It's the economy stupid!" (I'm not calling you are anyone else stupid, I'm just quoting Bill Clinton accurately).

 

No you're not. I gave objective proof, such as answering him and shaking his hand that undeniably shows he acknowledge that Obama was there.

For you to say he "refused to even acknowledge that his fellow competitor was there" is simply false and you know it.

If he didn't acknowledge that he was there, then how did he shake his hand? How did he respond to his questions? Surely even you can see the silliness of your assertion.

 

Obama doesn't seem to understand the ramifications of his plan in Iraq. He doesn't seem to grasp the ramifications of his plan with Afghanistan. He doesn't seem to even know what happened in Georgia, and couldn't give any coherent answers to it. And pronouncing names is not a good test of foreign policy.

Let's face it, Ken. You don't get it. You are biased and your judgment is flawed. You make demonstrably false statements and then stand by them. That is unacceptable.

 

I'm still confused.

Exactly how did Obama pass the commander-in-chief test?

Were we attacked last night?

Did he avert an international incident?

Did he deploy the Illinois National Guard to Pakistan?

How did I miss this?

 

Ken, why do you keep speaking for most Americans? You did this at the bottom post #6 also, when you said that most Americans thought that the war was a mistake.

 

That's not what you said. You said he refused to even acknowledge his fellow competitor. I pointed out however that he shook his hand (which requiers acknowledgement), he responded to his comments.

Here's another example: MCCAIN: With all due respect, you already gave them to the oil companies. (http://www.kansascity.com/445/story/816036-p4.html).

That is a comment directed to Obama, which shows very clearly that falseness of your statement. So I have given objective proof that your statement was wrong, and yet you stand by it. You sound like George Bush.


BTW, did you notice how much Obama interrupted McCain? I saw it over and over again in just the short amount I watched. Where I come from, that rude ... worse than calling your elders by their first name.

 

McCain did a far better job than I could do.

But let's get back to the point: Having been proven wrong through objective evidence, will you now apologize for your misrepresentation?

 

Reciting a few minutes of prepared talking points hardly qualifies someone to be commander-in-chief.

Can you show me an example of Obama keeping his head in a critical situation requiring an immediate response with the national interests of our country and the lives of it's citizens in the balance?