Why Chief Justice Roberts Made the Right Long-Term Decision With ObamaCare

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mandym, Jun 28, 2012.

  1. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/939...-the-right-long-term-decision-with-obamacare/
     
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,272
    Likes Received:
    620
    Thanks for posting this. I was thinking some of the same thoughts yesterday. Along with forever settling the issue of Congress mandating any purchases another issue that Republicans should hammer home is that Obama, president of Harvard Law School, the man that kept insisting the penalty for non-compliance was not a tax has just had his so-called superior intellect slapped down by the Supreme Court, by having it defined as a tax. (Oops, didn't see that coming...)

    Now he has to defend a huge tax increase on the middle class. If the Republicans frame it correctly there are all kinds of attack angles. I can already see the TV commercials:

    Twenty-something year old construction worker: "Obama says, health insurance my way or a tax you will pay!"

    Thirty year old black woman: "Democrats say they are pro-choice, but I get no choice--I must pay for health insurance one way or the other. Either buy my own--which I don't want--or help subsidize someone else's with Obama's tax."

    I kind of like the ring of that--"Obama's Tax". Maybe it can supplant ObamaCare, just call it ObamaTax.
     
  3. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,272
    Likes Received:
    620
    Another thing--Obama had a mantra during the 2008 campaign (and after) that he wouldn't raise taxes on the middle class. Only those with incomes over $250,000 would get a tax increase.

    He then proceeded to work his tail off to get the health insurance bill passed while America's economy was reeling. It was his number one priority.

    Now we've got the signature achievement of his Presidency and it turns out it's a hefty tax increase on the middle class!
     
  4. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    It has nothing to do with health care!!!!!!

    It is the invention of a new form of tax which can be used to destroy pensions and Social Security.
     
  5. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    The demcrats have already done both...
     
  6. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,272
    Likes Received:
    620
    I'd ask you to explain but on second thought, I don't want you to go there.
     
  7. freeatlast

    freeatlast
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
  8. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    As I see it, this ruling gives a road map for similar legislation in the future.

    Think it won't happen?
     
  9. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,272
    Likes Received:
    620
    If it does it will be labeled a tax from the get-go and be that much harder to pass.
     
  10. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    What everyone is forgetting is that Democrats will pass any kind of tax they want to if they control both houses and the presidency again. Just like they did last time with Obamacare, in spite of the outcry from the majority of Americans that they didn't want it. These Dems shoved it down our throats anyway.

    So, in the future, we could be required to have energy efficient windows for our homes or be TAXED if we don't comply. We could be required to purchase electric cars or be TAXED if we don't comply, and on and on. There is no end.

    Our only hope, and it is a slim one, is to take back both branches of government in 2012. Even that is no guarantee now that this Pandora's box has been opened up.

    I am still bitter over the incandescent light bulb ban that was introduced by a Republican Congressman. Needless to say, I'm hoarding bulbs....

    But anyway, you get my point, think this through. I don't think it was brilliant at all. There was some discussion today that it is thought by some (of course we will never really know) that Roberts was going to vote with the conservative wing but changed his mind just days before he wrote the decision. Was his family threatened or something like that? We will never know...

    No, it was not brillilant.
     
  11. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    The Democrats didn't have a problem getting Obamacare through, despite public opinion.
     
  12. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Re: Justice Roberts-

    There are rumors...
     
  13. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slippery Slope Fallacy
     
  14. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do not like Obamacare at all. In fact is scares me. My parents are left wing democrats largely because my father has been union all his like. And they are afraid of Obamacare.

    Having said that like so many other folks I claimed that the mandate was not constitutional based on the commerce clause. I and a great many other people was correct. This tax issue scares me as well but just because we do not like it and it stirs up fear does that make it not constitutional.

    I am not going to run around like chicken little over this. There are a number of other solutions to address this. We need to be willing to accept that this may be constitutional unless we can give a clear explanation or precedence why it is not.

    Either way we cannot just make the claim it is not constitutional just because we do not like it or are afraid of it.
     
  15. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    This country was founded on considering possible slippery slopes.That mind set created the constitution.

    However, you being able to prove it is a "fallacy" is a whole other thing. I would be interested in seeing that though. I look forward to your attempt.
     
  16. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    299
    It may be "constitutional" , but Obamacare is based on a mountain of lies and deceit and a corrupted process... passed by 1 vote over the objections of a majority of the American people.

    That is the real reason the public hasn't accepted it and never will.
     
  17. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1

    You are right, I just googled.

    This also explains why obama was so confident the SCOTUS would rule in his favor, even though he (obama) voted against the confirmation of Justice Roberts.
     
    #17 LadyEagle, Jun 30, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 30, 2012
  18. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    She implied a "Slippery Slope"....but it is only "fallacious" if there is absent any reasonable expectation that the following results will occur. She might very well be able to present a perfectly well reasoned inductive argument to establish a probability that her results might occur....Such as, arguments from Political History etc...

    From your own link:
    She never argued "Must inevitably".....and it is only fallacious if the notion is not supportable with clarifying reasons.
     
  19. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0

    He wasn't confident. In fact tall the dems were scared.
     
  20. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,272
    Likes Received:
    620
    Didn't have a problem? Don't you remember all those rancorous town hall meetings in the summer of 2009?

    The vote in the House was only 2 votes over the minimum to get it passed. 34 Dems voted against it.
     

Share This Page

Loading...