Why does bush warmonger when even his own blood does not believe

What heavy price will George Bush pay for his miscalculations in Iraq? When he leaves office, he and his cronies will be richer than ever, having made millions from their stock in companies with defense contracts and oil companies.

 

Hitler was going around attacking other nations , Saddam was not. In fact Saddam was nicely contained and could have easily been taken care of at a later date. Despite the best advice from the military Bush wanted to play John Wayne, and thanks to his poor planning we are stuck in a big ugly mess. we have not been greeted as liberators and we may never win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people but we have done all that can be reasonably been done.

 

The fact that the democrats won the Congress in 2006 and his Presidency is for all practical purposes over cut from 8 to 6 years is a heavy price.

The fact that the democrats have a much better than even chance of winning the Presidency next year due to his judgements is a heavy price.

The fact that history will call it a failed Presidency is a heavy price.

As far as what they do to enrich themselves after leaving office, there is not much different in what they are doing in office. Both democrats and republicans are interested in power and money, not the American people. How many times does this have to be said?

God will deal with, and IMHO, quite severely, those who have pandered to the Christian vote on false pretenses, and enriched themselves on the back of the American people. They are all that way. Cheney is probably the worst, but they are only seperated by small shades of gray, and that includes the democrats.

Hope that answers your question.

Again, the point I was making was, slamming Bush for all his past mistakes is not going to help us solve the Iraq problem.

 

I'd almost like to try Cheney's brand of conservatism, as opposed to this compassionate drivel we're being force-fed.

 

AP - If someone or even a large group of people in your family chose not to serve, what would that say about you?

Nothing.

It would say that a large portion of your family chose not to serve.

 

I agree with that. Since the WW2 generation, I think I am the only one in my family that served during the Vietnam era.

 

Joshua, The thing that bothers me about Bush's family serving or not serving ( and it really isn't important that they chose not to) is that Bush practally slapped every American that disagreed with his policies on Iraq in the face when he stated "Either you are with us or against us". I am sure the sacrifices that our brave men in uniform have made since then have not gone un-noticed by the Bush administration but the lack of commitemnt from Bushs' nephews to join the military just shows lack of any real unison from the family . This is the core, if family support is lacking what does that say about the Presidents' leadership qualities. Sadly, time has revealed that Bush is lacking in that department. All he can give us is lip service.

 

The maximum age for military service raised by Bush to:

* Active duty Army - 42
* Army Reserves - 42
* Army Natinal Guard - 42
* Active duty Air Force - 27
* Air Force Reserve - 34
* Air National guard - 34
* Active duty Navy - 34
* Navy Reserves - 39
* Active duty Marines - 28
* Marine Corps Reserves - 29
* Active duty Coast Guard - 27
* Coast Guard Reserves - 27

Why are you claiming that Bush's family members aren't qualified to enlist? Couldn't pass the mental tests?

 

Yep, AP, I got it.

Oh, so it's only about those that YOU say it's about? Forgive me. :laugh:

Only if they choose to be. They are free people with the same freedom to choose that you do. Whether or not they are related to the President is neither here nor even there.

Works just fine. You're welcome. :wavey:

 

Germany declared on the United States.

 

He will go down in history as one of the worst, if not the absolute worse presidents in United States history. His children, grandchildren, other relatives and friends will read over and over about his failings and miscalculations.

 

But he didnt attack the United states.

So if this nutbag in Iran gets squirrelly and puts his foot in his mouth by "declaring" on the United States, then you would favor military action against Iran?

 

Those German subs on our coastline must have been a figament of our imagination.
Just relying on memory here, didn't a german sub sink one of our passangers liners? I'll look it up later.
have a good day Ps104_33

 

I really don't think so.
That is not human nature.
Human nature is to "soften" the errors and focus more on the "bright" side of things.
Only God writes without apologies about His people.

 

Germany declared war on the US, remember?

Bush destablilized a major portion of the world and mortgaged the country to finance his ill-conceived war against Iraq - what is the "bright" side? That he lowered taxes, primarily for the rich, while borrowing from China?

 

1) On September 22, 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, starting an 8 year war in which Iraq employed chemical weapons against Iranian troops and ballistic missiles against Iranian cities.

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](2) In February 1988, Iraq forcibly relocated Kurdish civilians from their home villages in the Anfal campaign, killing an estimated 50,000 to 180,000 Kurds. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](3) On March 16, 1988, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iraqi Kurdish civilian opponents in the town of Halabja, killing an estimated 5,000 Kurds and causing numerous birth defects that affect the town today. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](4) On August 2, 1990, Iraq invaded and began a 7 month occupation of Kuwait, killing and committing numerous abuses against Kuwaiti civilians, and setting Kuwait's oil wells ablaze upon retreat. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](5) Hostilities in Operation Desert Storm ended on February 28, 1991, and Iraq subsequently accepted the ceasefire conditions specified in United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (April 3, 1991) requiring Iraq, among other things, to disclose fully and permit the dismantlement of its weapons of mass destruction programs and submit to long-term monitoring and verification of such dismantlement. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](6) In April 1993, Iraq orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate former President George Bush during his April 14-16, 1993, visit to Kuwait. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](7) In October 1994, Iraq moved 80,000 troops to areas near the border with Kuwait, posing an imminent threat of a renewed invasion of or attack against Kuwait. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](8) On August 31, 1996, Iraq suppressed many of its opponents by helping one Kurdish faction capture Irbil, the seat of the Kurdish regional government. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](9) Since March 1996, Iraq has systematically sought to deny weapons inspectors from the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) access to key facilities and documents, has on several occasions endangered the safe operation of UNSCOM helicopters transporting UNSCOM personnel in Iraq, and has persisted in a pattern of deception and concealment regarding the history of its weapons of mass destruction programs. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](10) On August 5, 1998, Iraq ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM, and subsequently threatened to end long-term monitoring activities by the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNSCOM. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](11) On August 14, 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-235, which declared that `the Government of Iraq is in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President `to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations.'. [/FONT]

• • [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif](12) On May 1, 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-174, which made $5,000,000 available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition for such activities as organization, training, communication and dissemination of information, developing and implementing agreements among opposition groups, compiling information to support the indictment of Iraqi officials for war crimes, and for related purposes. [/FONT]

 

Daisy, you didnt answer my question. If The president of Iran declares war on the United States, will you support the president if he attacks Iran? Dont be a hypocrite now.

 

I thought that was all a plot by Churchill to drag the United States into the war. You seem like a conspiracy theorist. I'm sure you bought that one.

 

It's a shame that Christians would support any administration that sponsors terrorism.