Often I have noticed MV's defenders claim that the Oldest Mss, text, codex are the Best. Then why don't they omit Mark's Longer Ending ( Mark 16:9-20) and Pericope Adulturae ( John 7:53-8:11) ? 1. Apparently the Oldest Codex Vaticanus B doesn't have Mark 16:9-20. Then why do MV's still keep them in the Bible even if they are in the bracket? By inserting in the Bible what is not the Bible, they are violating the commandment of God. When they debate about it, even if 617 mss has the Mark's Longer Ending, they vehemently defend B and Aleph which don't have the Longer Ending. Then why don't the MV's clearly remove them from the Bible, so that they may be more faithful to their God and with their own belief? 2. As for John 7:53-8:11, why don't MV's eliminate the verses completely? 3. Why don't they follow the Oldest mss P66 in John 7:39 by omitting " Holy" there? Why don't MV's keep their own principle, the Oldest the Best? Are they afraid that the people may realize their omissions ( Deceptions!) and would not buy their Bibles? Are they afraid about their business so much when they remove Mark's Longer Ending and Adulterous Woman story? Why do they betray their own belief for the Business? Why are they not bold enough to tell the people what they believe? Why do they "corrupt" their " holy" Bible by inserting what they believe are not the part of the genuine Bible? Can we or should we trust such people and such translations who do not behave as they believe? Why do they betray their own belief? for the business? for their convenience? Many other phrases or words which are controversial are omitted completely without bracket. Is it because such omissions cannot be detected by the common readers, but the big ones like the above mentioned ones are easy to find and therefore it is difficult for them to deceive the readers? Is it a kind of Deception Technology?