1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why I am KJV Only (Page 21)

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by skanwmatos, Apr 15, 2004.

Top Posters
Page 6 of 7
  1. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, for the simple reason that you refuse to see the inconsistencies and double standards of your position. </font>[/QUOTE]I do not care that they think of themselves calling, "KJVO", but I agree with them because we believe the KJB is the preserved, inspired Word of God.
     
    #101 Askjo, Apr 26, 2004
  2. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Yes, for the simple reason that you refuse to see the inconsistencies and double standards of your position. </font>[/QUOTE]I do not care that they think of themselves calling, "KJVO", but I agree with them because we believe the KJB is the preserved, inspired Word of God. </font>[/QUOTE]Which KJV? Is it the original one that has been revised?
     
    #102 gb93433, Apr 26, 2004
  3. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did I say the KJV is PERFECT?
     
    #103 Askjo, Apr 26, 2004
  4. skanwmatos

    skanwmatos New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    I "support" God's inspired word. He said "shamayim." I believe Him. Do you?
    Because I keep proving you wrong? I can understand why you feel that way. But, of course, there is a way to correct the problem. Learn something!
     
    #104 skanwmatos, Apr 27, 2004
  5. skanwmatos

    skanwmatos New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have never counted them, but there are probably hundreds. The most egregious are the root fallacy errors in the lexicon.
    As far as I know the only corrected Strong's is the Stronger Strong's edited by Kohlenberger and Swanson.
    We are talking about the misidentification of many words in the concordance itself as well as the root fallacy found so often in the lexicons.
     
    #105 skanwmatos, Apr 27, 2004
  6. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Askjo:I do not care that they think of themselves calling, "KJVO", but I agree with them because we believe the KJB is the preserved, inspired Word of God.

    Typical KJVO understatement. Ya left out one little word of your belief statement-'we believe the KJB is the "ONLY" preserved, inspired Word of God.'

    We believe the very same thing, minus the word "only". WE do NOT try to LIMIT GOD.
     
    #106 robycop3, Apr 27, 2004
  7. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Did I say the KJV is PERFECT? </font>[/QUOTE]When you wrote, "We believe the KJB is the preserved, inspired Word of God." Did you mean what you wrote or are you saying that inspired meant with errors? The inspired version was without error. It was from God not man (2 Peter 1:20, 21).
     
    #107 gb93433, Apr 27, 2004
  8. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As with a vast majority of the verbage that Will likes to 'grace' us with, I think very, very little of it. Although Will's style and volcabulary far surpass most other KJVOnlyists, it is still bunk.

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
    #108 Trotter, Apr 27, 2004
  9. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yup. Uh-huh. You gots it. Darn tootin'. Absolutely. For sure. Affirmative.

    [I'm not sure if I was clear enough...]

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
    #109 Trotter, Apr 27, 2004
  10. Pastor KevinR

    Pastor KevinR New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2001
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanx Roby...Askjo, did I read you right? you claimed the KJV is inspired, but not perfect? That's what your two posts say, isn't it?
     
    #110 Pastor KevinR, Apr 27, 2004
  11. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    You contradict by quoting:
    I checked heaven and heavenS in the NKJV and the KJV. The KJV is more accurate than the NKJV.
    Still inexcusable!
     
    #111 Askjo, Apr 27, 2004
  12. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did I say "only"?
     
    #112 Askjo, Apr 27, 2004
  13. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Errors in the KJV? Show me!
     
    #113 Askjo, Apr 27, 2004
  14. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is the humanity perfect? You accuse me for supporting the KJV inspiration, do you?
     
    #114 Askjo, Apr 27, 2004
  15. skanwmatos

    skanwmatos New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    And what Hebrew word did you base that determination on? Can you post it here? Can you tell us how to spell it in Hebrew? Can you tell us where the word comes from and where else it is found in the Hebrew bible?
    I agree! Your ignorance is still inexcusable!
     
    #115 skanwmatos, Apr 27, 2004
  16. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Errors in the KJV? Show me! </font>[/QUOTE]Take a look about half way down the page at http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/revision.htm
     
    #116 gb93433, Apr 27, 2004
  17. skanwmatos

    skanwmatos New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read the entire page and can't find anything about errors in the KJV. Did you post the wrong URL or were you just playing a trick on Askjo?
     
    #117 skanwmatos, Apr 27, 2004
  18. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Search for "BOLD"
    (mark "match exact word", mark "exact case")
    It is closer to the top than to the bottom.

    [​IMG]
     
    #118 Ed Edwards, Apr 27, 2004
  19. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    No, it wasn’t any trick.

    Maybe it takes awhile to download the page.

    The page took a second or so for me to download. But I have DSL.

    http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/revision.htm

    I told you to go too far down the page. It is shortly past the beginning. Sorry about that.

    Part way down the page it reads:
    KJV Differences & Revision Changes are in BOLD

    Then it lists the revisions and compares the KJV 1611 and the current KJV .
     
    #119 gb93433, Apr 27, 2004
  20. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why Ed is not KJVO:

    Genesis 19:21 concerning this thing
    concerning this thing also

    Genesis 19:21 KJV(1769):
    And he said unto him, See, I have accepted thee F85 concerning
    this thing also    , that I will not overthrow this city,
    for the which thou hast spoken.
    ---------------------------------------------
    FOOTNOTES:
    F85: thee: Heb. thy face


    KJV1873 has "concerning this thing also"

    KJV1611 has "concerning this thing"

    So, there is a Hebrew source variation in
    thee/thy face
    and some other variation is "also"/not "also".

    Using the nKJV for final authority :D

    Genesis 19:21 (nKJV)

    And he said to him, "See, I have favored you concerning
    this thing also, in that I will not overthrow
    this city for which you have spoken.

    So the New King James Version (nKJV) shows the
    KJV1611 was correct, the KJV1769 was wrong,
    and the KJV1873 corrected the KJV1769 error back
    to where it was in KJV1611.

    [​IMG]
     
    #120 Ed Edwards, Apr 27, 2004
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 6 of 7
Loading...