How in the world could the judge find that Trayvon's use of Marihuana isn't relevant? Doesn't she know drugs affect your actions and can make you look nervous (suspicious)? Doesn't she know that drug use speaks to his character and likely hood to do what George accuses him of doing? Doesn't she know that drug use makes a young man more prone to look for things to steal so as to buy more drugs, and indeed Trayvon wasn't the innocent little boy everyone seems to presume he is? What if he really was looking to break in to an easy target house to get drug money? Doesn't she know that if you threaten to call the police when speaking to a drug addict they might overreact and start a physical altercation? HOW IS THAT NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE!!!!????!!!!!!