Women preachers

Look how far FAL has come:

Sept. 2010:

Nov. 2010

Dec. 2010:

Jan. 2011:

Yada yada yada. . .

Now fast forward to Nov. 2011:

Dec. 2011 (this thread):

What a difference a year on the BB makes!:thumbs:

 

I would respond to this if it made any sense, but it's not even coherent.

 

LOL I bet by May he'll be preaching moral influence atonement. He may even wear short pants.

 

Having a social agenda is "liberal"?

Doesn't CBMW have a social agenda?

 

Oh well let me clear it up for you:

Rob bell denies the doctrines of hell or a literal wrath of God. In fact his position is that social injustice is hell. This is a theological left position and completely heretical. If there is no wrath of God then there is no need for the cross.

Rob Bell believes in universalism. He believes even Ghandi is in heaven per his own words.

Tony Campolo believes in the social gospel which, again, is a theological left position.

 

Nice to know that Jesus had a social agenda.

Remember the last judgment scene in Matthew. All about social justice and a social agenda. Theological correctness is not mentioned and <gasp> neither is Calvinism.

Told the rich young ruler to give to the poor.

Praised the Samaritan, not for his beliefs, but for his social agenda, helping the man by the side of the road.

Fed the 5000, big social agenda there.


Jesus preached mercy and forgiveness. Many here would call that left wing by board members who believe in mercy and forgiveness. But mercy, forgiveness and grace are cardinal virtues of Christ's teachings.

 

Not exactly in the sense of classic Protestant liberalism does. Campolo believes in the salvific act of Christ and the need for a personal relationship. The "social" element of it is, and he's correct about this, that the Bible is clear that Christ-followers are to care for the poor, oppressed and marginalized.

 

You can call it what you want but it is true liberalism.

 

A true theological liberal doesn't believe in the personal element of faith as you, I and Campolo do. They don't believe in the inspiration and infallibility of the Bible as you, I and Campolo do.

But you obviously know more about everything than I do, and think very highly of your own opinion, so I guess I should just shut up and wallow in my stupid, liberal brine.