The book of Matthew: Chapter 1: 1769 deletes one word. 1611- 524 words 1769- 523 words Chapter 2: 1769 adds one word. 1611- 664 words 1769- 665 words Chapter 3: 100% 1611- 421 words 1769- 421 words Chapter 4: 1769 deletes two words. 1611- 609 words 1769- 607 words Chapter 5: 1769 adds one word. 1611- 1176 words 1769- 1177 words Chapter 6: 100% 1611- 862 words 1769- 862 words Chapter 7: 1769 adds three words. 1611- 681 words 1769- 684 words Chapter 8: 100% 1611- 841 words 1769 -841 words Chapter 9: 1769 deletes two words. 1611- 915 words 1769- 913 words Chapter 10: 100% 1611- 1003 words 1769- 1003 words This comparison was done using e-Sword by simply copying the 1611 chapter to Word and doing a word count and comparing it to the 1769 KJV using the same methods. Example: 1611- Mat 1:1 The booke of the generation of Iesus Christ, the sonne of Dauid, the sonne of Abraham. Mat 1:2 Abraham begate Isaac, and Isaac begate Iacob, and Iacob begate Iudas and his brethren. 1769- Mat 1:1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. Mat 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; I posted this just to prove a point to our KJVO friends. I’m curious to see how many excuses are given to pardon the 1769 KJV for changing the AV1611. Things that are different are not the same. How many additions and deletions must be made before a translation is considered suspect using KJVO test methods? Does the KJVO interpretation of Psalm 12:6-7 apply to the 1611 vs. 1769 controversy? Does this verse apply? Mat 5:18 For verily I say vnto you, Till heauen and earth passe, one iote or one title, shall in no wise passe from the law, till all be fulfilled. -1611KJV Now keep in mind that I am using KJVO definitions and methods used to make MV’s suspect of KJVO conspiracy theories and guess work. Please note that I am simply applying KJVOism to the AV1611 vs. 1769KJV. Some may find this a bitter pill to swallow in that it exposes a double standard that exist in KJVOism.