many are concerned when issues concerning a persons doctrine come up, those who desire to compare doctrine and define the gospel for the sake of a real conversion, it is good to call them who have doctrine that is so misleading that it goes to the point of believing in a different jesus and a different gospel then the truth and the real gospel that is biblical, and the power of salvation is based on Gods word. i know some believe that doctrine is a small point and just any type of confirmation and naming Jesus is biblical enough and that we shouldn't divide the lines but to unify. But i would like to see more of the biblical differences placed and seperation would at least show liberals who may even come in conflict with the doctrine they now have and repent, and turn to the real God of the bible. it may get old to keep fighting for good doctrine but i hope that compromise never becomes the norm. a person can be a baptist or any Christian denomination and still not be saved, doctrine is important. i maybe wrong but at some point believing in too many liberal ideas could lead to not trusting in the real Jesus of the bible. i think it is a good warning to show those that evolution, and making metaphors of clear biblical truths can be dangerous. those who believe that we evolved from primates or those who believe that God doesn't see certain lifestyles as sin, have set up a non biblical god.