1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

You knew this was going to happen...

Discussion in 'Free-For-All Archives' started by The Galatian, Dec 30, 2004.

  1. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    HOUSE REPUBLICANS MOVE TO WEAKEN ETHICS COMMITTEE:
    Panel chief may lose post for allowing criticism of DeLay

    WASHINGTON - In the wake of back-to-back ethics slaps at House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, House Republicans are preparing to make it more difficult to begin ethics investigations and could remove the Republican chairman who presided over the admonishments delivered to DeLay last fall.

    A House leadership aide said that a package of rules changes to be presented to the House when the 109th Congress convenes Tuesday could include a plan that would require a majority vote of the ethics panel to pursue an investigation.

    At present, a deadlock on the panel, which is evenly split between the two parties, keeps the case pending. The possible change, the aide said, would mean that a tie vote would effectively dismiss the case.

    The aide said the change would instill more bipartisanship in ethics cases by requiring that members of both parties support inquiries. But Democrats and outside groups said the proposal would dilute an already weak ethics process.

    It remained uncertain whether panel chief Rep. Joel Hefley of Colorado would stay in that post. A spokesman for Speaker Dennis Hastert said no decision had been made.

    Many Republicans expressed dissatisfaction with Hefley after the reports critical of DeLay, R-Sugar Land, were issued, saying he had allowed Democrats to score political points against the majority leader for conduct that did not merit such scrutiny. The potential for change in the chairmanship has drawn fire from Democrats and ethics watchdogs.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/12/30/MNG24AINRP1.DTL

    The Dallas Morning News reports that Texas Legislators are being asked to find a way to remove the power of Austin DA Ronny Earle (who has successfully prosecuted a number of democrat politicians) to handle the ongoing investigation of DeLay's involvment in an influence-peddling scheme.

    I think DeLay is starting to sweat. He's calling all his favors in.
     
  2. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,002
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I hope they make the change to a majority vote.
     
  3. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    It might seem like a good idea to allow the majority party to excuse any of their leaders in corruption cases.

    But remember the door swings both ways. That would have kept Jim Wright in his leadership position.

    Don't assume Congress will always have a republican majority.

    Rule of thumb. Don't set up anything in government you wouldn't want Hillary Clinton to have.
     
Loading...