1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Your View on Women as Deacons

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Zenas, Aug 20, 2009.

  1. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Greetings, planets. Much of Scripture, with careful study, can be understood by the believer with the help of the Holy Spirit.

    Other passages are not so easy, and its there that original language and knowledge of the day will help. Nothing in the Bible is supposed to be a secret, but being removed from its writing by nearly 2000 years puts us at a disadvantage. Therefore, having knowledge of the literary and historical context are of great help. I don't have access to these myself, as my training is strictly theological, but I don't even try to interpret difficult passages without the help of good commentary and other outside assistance.

    For instance, if I take what the Bible says in plain English, then men shouldn't have long hair and women shouldn't pray with their heads uncovered. And I should treat my slaves nicely. Most of us wouldn't think these things are normative for us today, but they were in the case of Paul's intended audience. That doesn't mean we can't be taught by these passages, but it means we don't take them at their "plain English" appearance.

    Also, the Bible wasn't written in English and there is no one original copy in the original languages, so there is a lot of interpretation necessary. That's why we have some many translations. The KJV, though used greatly for the Kingdom for hundreds of years, falls far short today because many word meanings have changed and we have access to more reliable and earlier texts. We're always working toward a more faithful translation of God's Word.

    Also, denominations are more fluid today than ever. And people like me, who have a role to play in the local church, are finding that God would have us be willing to work in different settings. It's truth, not "mumbo jumbo."

    Blessings.
     
  2. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Parish the thought!
     
  3. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I was just at the Capitol Hill Baptist Church website and was suprised to read that they have a woman on their pastoral staff:thumbs:
     
  4. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    For any churches that do not have women deacons or staff, the male deacons have wives at home who have opinions too.
     
  5. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    I don't think there is one church around that doesn't have a woman on staff somewhere. If there is, I'm sure it's not working to it's full potential. I know our church would fall apart if there were no women working there!
     
  6. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    My view exactly.
     
  7. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    So scripture is subjective?
     
  8. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, Baptists believe in local church autonomy. Therefore, different local bodies can differ in opinion and interpretation.

    In any event, much of what we know about early church policy is that it was ad hoc.
     
  9. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    There are more facts than one could know if they do not study.

    It is not a matter of useless opinion but rather truth.
     
  10. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not saying Scripture is untrue. Saying that many of the examples in Scripture were ad hoc.

    And saying that Baptists disagree a lot. Which is true. That's why they believe in autonomy.
     
  11. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    I have found that not many have studied to find the truth about this issue but rather play follow the leader. I have also found that some know the truth but out of fear do not do what they know. The truth does not disagree with itself. There is only one truth and every teacher should study to find it otherwise admit ignorance.
     
  12. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't believe there is Scriptural warrant or mandate for them. That said, some very Christ-centered, God honoring churches out of fidelity to Scripture using sound hermeneutics do in fact have women deacons. I do not believe it an issue to die on the cross over. This is not as important as, say inerrancy of Scripture, the doctrine of God, the exclusivity of the gospel, etc.

    Some very prominent SBC churches have women as deacons, btw.
     
  13. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're right. No matter how we slice it, some are going to disagree.

    I know what the previous poster is trying to say, and there is one absolute Truth, but we're not always going to find it on every issue no matter how hard we try due to the parasite of sin that we cannot completely escape during this life.
     
  14. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    I believe there is a distinct difference between deacons and deaconesses especially in the way they served the early church.

    There is plenty of evidence that the early church utilized women in ministry. There were women whose responsibility was to work with other women and children. They performed pastoral work with the sick and the poor and helped at baptism. From the earliest times deaconesses visited the sick, acted as door-keepers at the women's entrance to the church, kept order among church women, taught females in preparation for baptism and acted as sponsors for homeless children. They also carried official messages. There was a clearer line drawn between the sexes than there is today. Women deacons were not on the same level as men deacons. They could not teach and minister to mixed groups of people or men, and they were not ordained.

    For the first 1200 years of Christianity there is loads of evidence of woman deacons in the church. However, the Western Roman Catholic church never had them. Whereas, the eastern church did.

    The emergence of deaconesses is unclear. But in the third and fourth centuries the office of deaconess developed greatly. In a letter dated 112 A.D. Governor Pliny wrote a letter to the emperor Trajan. In it he mentions a couple of deaconesses (Loeb Library Series, Pliny, Book X, XCVI, 8, 289).

     
  15. RAdam

    RAdam New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a case where man makes difficult that which is simple. I really worry for people that cannot accept the simple language of scripture when they come to the truly difficult parts.

    Phoebe was not a deacon, she was a servant of the church. Deacons, like elders, were to be men. This is clear unless you monkey around with the language by going to the Greek or Hebrew as an excuse to allow women into offices they are forbidden to hold. The elder was to be a man, and then Paul uses the word "likewise" when he moves on to deacon qualifications. Then he proceeds to limit the office of deacon to men specifically.

    It's pretty hard to be a husband when you are a woman and it is pretty hard to rule your house well when you are supposed to be subject to your husband. It's real simple. Would to God people would accept the simple language of scripture rather than rejecting it because it doesn't fit the way they think things should be.
     
  16. John Toppass

    John Toppass Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    8
    Nail on the head!!!! If some of the more prominent churches have women deacons / deaconesses then they are not scriptual in that regard, but they are doing things the way the world would want them to do.
     
  17. Juan the Baptist

    Juan the Baptist New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Aren't there still women "preachers" (not necessarily pastors) serving in the SBC?
     
  18. dcorbett

    dcorbett Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,414
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist

    The Bible is our handbook....we cannot say one part applies and another doesn't. My Daddy was a deacon, and he would never even THINK of a woman filling that position anymore than he would follow a woman Pastor.
    The role of the sexes has eroded through the years, but God intended men to fill those positions.
     
  19. RAdam

    RAdam New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. I get tired of hearing about the "male dominated society." The Bible did not take its cues from society, it set itself apart from society. The same man that said women weren't to teach or have positions of authority in the church instructed men to love their wives as Christ loved the church, and stated that women had one of the most important jobs in the world: instructing the kids at home. Paul was not a sexist neither was he following societal norms, but rather he was writing under divine inspiration showing the way God wanted things done from there on out.
     
  20. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Paul was still writing to a society that, Christians or not, reflected its culture. It doesn't make the Bible uninspired; quite the contrary. The fact that it spoke to a particular people in a particular situation makes it all the more relevant to us today.

    But the Bible did take cues from society. What about requirements for headwear? What about dietary concerns? We don't (at least, we generally don't) follow those today, but back then it was necessary, as Christians (or, previously, Jews) were expected to acquiesce to different demands of society.

    This is divine accommodation. This is why God tolerated plural marriage, even though it was never part of His ideal, for instance. It means that the point itself, while still inspired and profitable for our benefit, is not binding to us today.

    This is not a contrived, dishonest decision. This is where we get on a difficult issue by doing as much scholarship as possible toward understanding Scripture and what it said in its original context. I have respect for any position one comes to on this issue, as long as they do their best to be faithful in exegeting and interpreting Scripture.
     
Loading...