1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJV 3 - New Version

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by robycop3, May 15, 2012.

  1. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
  2. Baptist4life

    Baptist4life Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    82
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Looks a lot like the NKJV.
     
  3. Baptist4life

    Baptist4life Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    82
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where did you find out about this?
    Is it "order only" or on Christian bookshelves?
     
  4. glazer1972

    glazer1972 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would we need this when we have the NKJV?
     
  5. franklinmonroe

    franklinmonroe Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    4
    I have read Jay Green's self-published KJV3 NT in paperback. It has several typos in it. Of course, it is TR-based.
     
  6. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This was one of Jay Green's several translations, which included King James II, Modern King James and King James-Twentieth Century.

    You can tell it's Green's work from his translation of John 3:8, which he insisted every other translator had gotten wrong:

    "The Spirit breathes where He desires, and you hear His voice; but you do not know from where He comes, and where He goes; so is everyone having been generated from the Spirit."

    I think Green made some improvements, hardly any of them acceptable to hard-core KJV-onlyists. The text by and large reflects the KJV, with a number of exceptions, such as the use of Jehovah instead of Lord, the nations for Gentiles, assembly for church (echoes of Tyndale), and others.

    I think it's an interesting translation in some aspects (and has some good renderings), but I know of no reason to prefer it to the NKJV for regular use.
     
    #6 rsr, May 15, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2012
  7. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Does it include the Apocrypha like the original KJV?

    Or does it leave it out?
     
  8. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No Apocrypha.
     
  9. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I also would point out that Green put the Comma Johanneum in italics, indicating that he had supplied words not in the text.

    (Sovereign Grace Publishers maintains that KJ3 is a word-for-word translation, with no words added and no words omitted. Green, while priding himself on fidelity to the text, obviously added words, just as the KJV and all translators do in order to reflect the meaning of the originals in another language.)
     
  10. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    An internet friend sent me an email with the link on it. I don't know where HE heard about it.
     
  11. preacher4truth

    preacher4truth Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,121
    Likes Received:
    17
    I like the change of Revelation 22:17 from the KJV:

    And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.


    to the KJ3:

    And the Spirit and the bride say, Come!
    And the one hearing, let him say, Come!
    And the one thirsting, let him come; and
    the one willing, let him take of the water
    of life freely.
     
  12. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's been around for a while. The copyright for KJ3 is 2006, and it's a revision of Green's earlier translations, so it has a following, even if it is limited. (Green died four years ago, BTW.)
     
  13. franklinmonroe

    franklinmonroe Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    4
    I wondering what you intended by "King James-Twentieth Century"? There is a 20th Century New Testament and there is a 21st Century KJV, but neither is by Green.
     
  14. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I fear I may have been misinformed. Many sources show "King James Version - Twentieth Century Edition" as one of his translations, but I have been unable to locate such a beast and suspect it was (1) misattributed or (2) was subsumed into the KJ3 without a trace. My apologies.
     
  15. franklinmonroe

    franklinmonroe Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Not a problem, brother.
     
Loading...